### Seminars

# Lunch Seminar TOM (Theory, Organisation and Markets)

## Upcoming events

**Thursday 23 May 2019 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**BIZET Romain**(Mines ParisTech) :__Keep calm and carry on: A theory of governmental crisis communication__**Pierre Fleckinger (Mines ParisTech and PSE)**- AbstractThis paper develops a model of strategic communication which questions how informed governments can credibly and effectively disclose warning information to exposed populations in the wake of major disasters. Credible public communication strategies take the form of severity scales whose optimal design hinges on the divergence between individual and social preferences, typically embodied by the existence of external effects of individual responses. Private and committed modes of communication are also investigated and shown to increase expected welfare. The paper also considers combinations of crisis communication with disaster management strategies. In particular, when ex post transfers are available - e.g. through public relief funds or emergency response plans - it is optimal for the government to subsidize pro-social actions and to provide partial public insurance when responses entail negative externalities. These transfers facilitate communication and improve response. Several policy aspects and applications of the model are discussed.
- Full text [pdf]

**Tuesday 28 May 2019 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**KE Shaowei**(University of Michigan) :__Behavioral neural networks__

**Thursday 13 June 2019 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**BLOCH Francis**(PSE) :__*__

**Thursday 20 June 2019 12:30-13:30**- salle R1-13, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**OZKES Ali**(Paris Dauphine) :__TBA__

## Archives

**Thursday 9 May 2019 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-01, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**BOBTCHEFF Catherine**(PSE) :__On the social value of (not) disclosing negative results__**Raphaël Levy (HEC) et Thomas Mariotti (TSE)**

**Thursday 9 May 2019 11:25-12:25****CHATTERJEE Kalyan**(Penn State) :__Repeated Coordination with Private Learning__

**Thursday 18 April 2019 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-01, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**GALICHON Alfred**(NYU) :__The equilibrium flow problem__**Larry Samuelson (Yale) and Lucas Vernet (Sciences Po)**- AbstractWe introduce the 'equilibrium flow problem' as an extension of the classical min-cost flow problem. Applications to trade on networks, demand theory, two-sided matching with and without transfers, and dynamic programming are provided. Existence and structural properties are discussed, as well as a regularized version of the problem.

**Thursday 11 April 2019 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-01 Campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**LEVIN Dan**(Ohio State University) :__Misbehavior in Common Value Auction__**Jim Peck (Ohio State University)**- AbstractWe study optimal misbehavior by an auctioneer (shill bidding) or by (rings of) bidders in two auction formats in a pure CV environment. Specifically, we consider the dynamic English (EA), and the static Sophi auction, that are outcome equivalent without misbehavior. We first characterize the optimal misbehavior strategy of the ring or the auctioneer, and then compare/rank those formats by their immunity to such misbehavior. The recent theoretical and experimental literature documented and explained the observation that often dynamic auctions outperform their “equivalent” static (one shot) strategic implementation. A main result is that the static version is more immune to several forms of misbehavior, which might be one reason why it still flourishes.

**Tuesday 9 April 2019 14:00-17:00**- salle R1-14, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**LEVIN Dan**(Ohio State University) :__Séminaire Exceptionnel avec Dan Levin__- AbstractOVERVIEW of TALK: Dan Levin will review a large share of his experimental (and theory) work on common-value (CV) auctions, also known as “mineral-right auctions.” He will provide a wide background to non-experts to motivate the interest in CV auctions. This includes: adverse selection and the difficulty of (at least student) bidders to cope with it. What is meant by the Winner’s Curse (WC), by theorists and by experimentalists? Why do we care about bidders’ overbidding and losses? Are there ways to avoid the WC? Is the adverse selection the main cause of the WC? Do subjects learn with experience and what do they learn? What is the role information complexity in the auction environment and subjects’ heterogeneity in creating the WC? He will also discuss two recent papers on the topic (bolded below). References and useful links. http://www.econ.ohio-state.edu/levin/ Common Value Auctions and the Winner’s Curse, 2002. Princeton University Press, (with J. H. Kagel) Could we overcome the Winner’s Curse by (Behavioral) Auction Design? 2019 WP (With Philipp Reiss). An Experimental Study of Estimation and Bidding in Common-Value Auctions with Public Information, 2019. Journal of Economic Theory, 179(1) pp. 73-98. (With Gary Charness and David Schmeidler).

**Thursday 4 April 2019 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-01, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**XING Zhaojun**(Bielefeld/Paris 1/PSE) :__Voronoi Language Games with Knightian Uncertainty__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 21 March 2019 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-01 capus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**GLEYZE Simon**(PSE) :__Informationally Simple Implementation__**Agathe Pernoud (Stanford University)**

**Thursday 14 March 2019 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-01 campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**LEDUC Matt**(PSE) :__Endogenous fragility in complex economic systems__**Matt Elliott (Cambridge University) and Ben Golub (Harvard University)**

**Thursday 21 February 2019 12:30-13:30**- salle R1-09, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**MOMOT Ruslan**(HEC) :__User Privacy in Platforms__**Itay P. Fainmesser (Johns Hopkins Carey Business School), Andrea Galeotti (London Business School)**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 20 December 2018 12:30-14:00**- salle R2-01, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**COMBE Julien**(UCL) :__The Design of Teacher Assignment: Theory and Evidence__**Olivier Tercieux (CNRS & PSE) and Camille Terrier (HEC Lausanne)**- AbstractThe reassignment of teachers to schools is a central issue in education policies. In several countries, this assignment is managed by a central administration that faces a key constraint: ensuring that teachers obtain an assignment that they weakly prefer to their current position. To satisfy this constraint a variation on the Deferred Acceptance (DA) mechanism of Gale and Shapley (1962) has been proposed in the literature and used in practice---for example, in the assignment of French teachers to schools. We show that this mechanism fails to be efficient in a strong sense: we can reassign teachers in a way that i) makes them better-off and ii) better fulfills the administration's objectives represented by the priority rankings of the schools. To address this weakness, we characterize the class of mechanisms that do not suffer from this efficiency loss and elicit a set of strategy-proof mechanisms within this class. To empirically assess the extent of potential gains associated with the adoption of our mechanisms, we use a rich dataset on teachers' applications for transfers in France. These empirical results confirm both the poor performance of the modified DA mechanism and the significant improvements that our alternative mechanisms deliver in terms of teachers' mobility and administration's objectives.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 6 December 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-01, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**LAMBERT-MOGILIANSKY Ariane**(PSE) :__Phishing for (quantum-like) Phools: Theory and evidence.__**V. I. Danilov (Russian Academy of Sciences), A. Calmettes (Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna) and H. Gonay (GetQuanty)**- AbstractThe presentation will be based on two articles: 1. Targeting in quantum persuasion problems JME (2018) joint with V.I Danilov Abstract: In this paper we investigate the potential for persuasion arising from the quantum indeterminacy of a decision-maker's beliefs, a feature that has been proposed as a formal expression of well-known cognitive limitations. We focus on a situation where an agent called Sender only has few opportunities to influence the decision-maker called Receiver. We do not address the full persuasion problem but restrict attention to a simpler one that we call targeting, i.e. inducing a specific belief state. The analysis is developed within the frame of a n-dimensional Hilbert space model. We find that when the prior is known, Sender can induce a targeted belief with a probability of at least 1/n when using two sequential measurements. This figure climbs to 1/2 when both the target and the belief are known pure states. A main insight from the analysis is that a well-designed strategy of distraction can be used as a first step to confuse Receiver. We thus find that distraction rather than the provision of relevant arguments is an effective means to achieve persuasion. We provide an example from political decision-making. 2. The power of distraction: An experimental test of quantum persuasion (2018) joint with A. Calmettes, H. Gonay forthcoming in LNCS Springer. Abstract: Quantum-like decision theory is by now a well-developed field. We here test the predictions of an application of this approach to persuasion as developed by Danilov and Lambert-Mogiliansky in (Danilov and Lambert-Mogiliansky 2018). One remarkable result entails that in contrast to Bayesian predictions, distraction rather than relevant information has a powerful potential to influence decision-making. We conducted an experiment in the context of donations to NGOs active in the protection of endangered species.We first tested the quantum incompatibility of two perspectives 'trust' and 'urgency' in a separate experiment. We next recruited 1371 respondents and divided them into three groups: a control group, a first treatment group and the main treatment group. Our main result is that 'distracting' information significantly affected decision-making: it induced a switch in respondents' choice as to which project to support compared with the control group. The first treatment group which was provided with compatible information exhibited no difference compared with the control group. Population variables play no role suggesting that quantum-like indeterminacy may indeed be a basic regularity of the mind. We thus find support for the thesis that the manipulability of people's decision-making is linked to the quantum indeterminacy of their subjective representations (mental pictures) of the choice alternatives.

**Thursday 22 November 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**TALLON Jean-Marc**(PSE) :__Tailored recommendations__

**Thursday 8 November 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**LEVY Gilat**(London School of Economics) :__Concerned with careers? Career development, task assignment, and labour market competition__**Heski Bar Isaac (Rotman School of Management)**- AbstractFirms have discretion over the kinds of task to which they assign workers. This affects workers' opportunities to advance their careers and, consequently, their efforts. Both firms' task allocation and workers' effort decisions interact through the extent of labour market competition: more competition increases the return to effort, but decreases firms' incentives to assign workers to informative tasks. Competition can therefore increase or decrease firm profits, worker payoffs, and welfare. One consequence is that firms may choose strategies that lead to increased competition. When the employee pool is heterogeneous, firms might choose different strategies that attract different kinds of workers and differentiate themselves through the career opportunities that they offer.

**Thursday 11 October 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**PEREZ Eduardo**(Sciences Po) :__Information Design with Agency__**Jacopo Bizzotto (University of Oslo) and Adrien Vigier (Norwegian Business School)**- AbstractWe study the problem of a principal who relies on an agent for the production of public information destined to the players of a continuation game. The agent has access to a status quo procedure to generate information. The principal is given the opportunity to design a better procedure, but her design is constrained by the status quo in two ways: First, the new procedure must use the same set of signals as the status quo procedure; Second, the agent incurs a cost of switching to the new procedure. The principal can reward the agent with monetary transfers up to a limited liability constraint, but we assume that procedures are not contractible, only signals are. The principal therefore faces a problem of information design with agency in which she must trade off informativeness about the states of the world to influence the continuation game with informativeness about the choice of the agent to reduce the cost of agency. We provide a general methodology for solving these problems and characterize optimal implementable procedures. We examine comparative statics with respect to switching cost. Finally, we apply our results to information acquisition, leak prevention and persuasion examples.

**Thursday 4 October 2018 12:30-12:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdn - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**DWORCZAK Piotr**(Northwestern University) :__The Simple Economics of Optimal Persuasion__**Giorgio Martini (Stanford GSB)**- AbstractConsider a Bayesian persuasion problem in which the Sender’s preferences depend only on the mean of posterior beliefs. We show that there exists a price schedule for posterior means such that the Sender’s problem becomes a consumer-like choice problem: The Sender purchases posterior means using the prior distribution as her endowment. Prices are determined in equilibrium of a Walrasian economy with the Sender as the only consumer and a single firm that has the technology to garble the state. Welfare theorems provide a verification tool for optimality of a persuasion scheme, and characterize the structure of prices that support the optimal solution. This price-theoretic approach yields a tractable solution method for persuasion problems with infinite state spaces. As an application, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for optimality of a monotone partitional signal. We show that the approach extends to competition in persuasion and persuasion problems with no restrictions on Sender’s utility.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 20 September 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**KOESSLER Frédéric**(PSE) :__Cheap talk with partial language competence__**Jeanne Hagenbach (Sciences Po)**

**Thursday 6 September 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**MUIR Ellen**(Standford University ) :__Equilibrium Adjustment Dynamics__**Simon Loertscher (University of Melbourne)**- AbstractAbstract: We study asset markets in which agents with private information about their values arrive over time. Each agent is endowed with some units of the asset and has a commonly known maximum demand. As a function of her value and the values of all others, each agent optimally either buys, sells, or does not trade. We show that the equilibrium under the socially optimal mechanism involves phases of market imbalances during which sellers, or less frequently buyers, are on the long side. Calling a market a buyers' (sellers') market when the terms of trade favor buyers (sellers), we show that buyers (sellers) being on the short side is neither necessary nor sufficient for a buyers' (sellers') market. The optimal mechanism involves (partial) price rigidity insofar as some traders' prices do not change even as other traders' allocations do. The optimal adjustment dynamics to out-of-equilibrium states involve fire trades -- the immediate liquidation of trades whose level exceeds the socially optimal storage threshold -- followed by slow and incremental adjustments to a typical state.

**Thursday 14 June 2018 12:30-13:30****The session was canceled.**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 75014 Paris
**COUANAU Quentin**(PSE) :__TBA__

**Thursday 7 June 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**COLO Philippe**(PSE) :__Cheap Talk under Ambiguity: The IPCC in Climate-Change Agreements.__- AbstractAbstract : The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has gained a central position on the report of scientific knowledge on climate change. This paper shows that the IPCC can take advantage of it to mitigate the inefficiency of the level of greenhouse gas emissions in international environmental agreements (IEA). I model an IEA as a game of contribution to a public bad. In making confidence statements over global warming predictions, the IPCC plays a cheap talk game with IEA participants. Under the assumption that players are maxmin expected utility maximisers I show that there is a unique sequential equilibrium in this game. This result backs up the idea that the IPCC could play a regulatory part in the management of climate change. In addition, it sheds new light on the role of strategic communication under ambiguity, supporting the view that it can contribute to restoring economic efficiency.

**Thursday 31 May 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014, Paris
**ERLANSON Albin**(Stockholm School of Economics) :__Costly Verification in Collective Decisions.__**Andreas Kleiner**- AbstractWe study how a principal should optimally choose between implementing a new policy and maintaining the status quo when the information relevant for the decision is privately held by agents. Agents are strategic in revealing their information, but the principal can verify an agent’s information at a given cost. We exclude monetary transfers. When is it worthwhile for the principal to incur the cost and learn an agent’s information? We characterize the mechanism that maximizes the expected utility of the principal. The evidence is verified whenever it is decisive for the principal’s decision. This mechanism can be implemented as a weighted majority voting rule, where agents are given additional weight if they provide evidence for their information. The evidence is verified whenever it is decisive for the principal’s decision. Additionally, we find a general equivalence between Bayesian and ex-post incentive compatible mechanisms in this setting. Finally, we extend our analysis of optimal mechanisms to imperfect verification.

**Thursday 24 May 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**GORELKINA Olga**(University of Liverpool) :__Collusion via Information Sharing and Optimal Auctions__

**Thursday 17 May 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R1-15, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**BOUACIDA Elias**(PSE) :__Consistency of Choice Correspondences: a Theoretical and an Empirical Study.__- AbstractExperiments in economics generally elicit a choice function: for a given choice set, a decision maker chooses exactly one alternative. It is a restriction on most models of revealed preferences, that start with a choice correspondence: for a given choice set, a decision maker chooses a subset of alternatives. This paper explores the impact of this restriction on the formulation of revealed preferences axioms and on the consistency of observed behaviors. In order to do so, a new methodology is built to elicit a choice correspondence in an incentive compatible way, called pay-for-certainty. We introduce a new theoretical requirements, increasing chosen set that guarantees the elicitation of a proper choice correspondence with the pay-for-certainty methodology. We implement the methodology in the laboratory and compare it to choice functions. 40.13% of observed choices are singletons and only 2.33% of subjects have single-peaked preferences. Increasing chosen set is verified by 60.47% of the subjects in the relevant case. 46.51% of all choices correspondences verify WARP whereas 58.82% of all choice functions do. In a second step, we use the pay-for-certainty methodology to explore the completeness of preferences assumptions, a task impossible with choice functions. We assess degrees of incomplete preferences. A lower bound introduced by Eliaz and Ok (2006) explains only 2.68% of observed behaviors. We characterized and upper bound. It is equivalent to the decision maker maximizing a strict partial preference. It explains 14.77% of observed behaviors. These results points to the relevance of observing choice correspondences instead of choice functions when a choice correspondence is needed to test a theory. .

**Thursday 3 May 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R1-13, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**GOSSNER Olivier**(CNRS and X and LSE) :__Dynamic Bank Runs.__- AbstractWe study a model of dynamic bank runs under private information. We characterize a unique equilibrium in threshold strategies, discuss the informational and fundamental determinants of bank stability and compare outcomes in the dynamic model to its static counterpart.

**Thursday 12 April 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R1-13, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**RINCON ZAPATERO Juan Pablo**(Université Carlos III Madrid) :__Recursive Utility and Thompson Aggregators (joint avec R. Becker)__**R. Becker**- AbstractWe reconsider the theory of Thompson aggregators proposed by Mari- nacci and Montruccio. First, we prove a variant of their Recovery Theorem estabilishing the existence of extremal solutions to the Koopmans equa- tion. Then, under more restrictive conditions, we demonstrate there is a unique solution to the Koopmans equation. Our proof is based on concave operator techniques as first developed by Kransosels’kii. This differs from Marinacci and Montruccio’s proof as well as proofs given by Martins de la Rocha and Vailakis.

**Thursday 5 April 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**HA-HUY Thai**(Université de Cergy ) :__A Not so Myopic Axiomatization of Discounting__**Jean-Pierre Drugeon**- Abstract«This article builds an axiomatization of inter-temporal trade-offs that makes an explicit account of the distant future and thus encompasses motives related to sustainability, transmission to offsprings and altruism. The focus is on separable representations and the approach is completed following a decision-theory index based approach that is applied to infinite dimension streams. This enlightens the limits of the commonly used flat tail intensity requesites for the evaluation of utility sequences: in this article, these are supersed and replaced by an axiomatic approach to optimal myopy degrees that in its turn precedes the determination of optimal discount. The overall approach is anchored on the new and explicit proof of a temporal decomposition of the preference orders between the distant future and the close future itself directly anchored on the determination of the optimal myopia degrees. The argument is shown to provide a novel understanding of temporal biases with the scope for a distant future bias when the finite dimensional gets influenced by the infinite dimensional. The reference to robust orders and pessimism-like axioms finally allows for determining tractable representations for the indexes.»

**Thursday 29 March 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**SANKTJOHANSER Anna**(TSE) :__Optimally Stubborn__- AbstractI consider a bargaining game with two types of players - rational and stubborn. Rational players choose demands at each point in time. Stubborn players are restricted to choose from the set of ``insistent'' strategies that always make the same demand and never accept anything less. However, their initial choice of demand is unrestricted. I characterize the equilibria in this game. Relative to the case with exogenous behavioral types, strong behavioral predictions emerge: in the limit, players randomize over at most two demands. However, unlike in a world with exogenous types, there is Folk theorem like payoff multiplicity.

**Thursday 22 March 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**BAUMANN Léonie**(University of Cambridge ) :__Identifying the best agent in a network.__- AbstractThis paper develops a mechanism for a principal to allocate a prize to the most valued agent when agents have a knowledge network. The principal does not know any agent's value but any two linked agents know each other's values. Agents compete for the prize and send costless private messages about their own value and the values of others they know to the principal. Agents can lie only to a certain extent and only lie if it increases their chances of winning the prize. A mechanism that determines each agent's chances of winning for any possible message profile is proposed. We show that with this mechanism, there exists an equilibrium such that the most valued agent wins with certainty if every agent has at least one link; if the network is a star or complete, then the most valued agent wins with certainty in every equilibrium.

**Thursday 15 March 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 PARIS
**KOPYLOV Igor**(University of California, Irvine) :__Combinatorial Subjective State Spaces__- AbstractI construct subjective state spaces S for preferences over finite menus. The additive representation of Kreps (1979) is relaxed to a weaker model called coherent aggregation. This model improves the identification of subjective states in several ways. First, the minimal size of S can be specified explicitly in terms of preferences. It allows combinatorial applications: starting from monotonic preferences over menus that have at most k elements, one can identify subjective state spaces that have up to k states. Second, coherent aggregation can be non-monotonic and hence, accommodate preferences for commitment. The case of singleton S delivers Gul and Pesendorfer's (2005) model of changing tastes. Third, the coherent aggregation model has equivalent interpretations in terms of incomplete dominance relations and choice functions that are both induced}endogenously by preferences. The induced dominance has a Pareto representation with subjective states. The induced choice function C is rationalized via strict maximization of subjective states. The path-independence of C characterizes the case where all subjective states are linear orders, as in Aizerman and Malishevski (1981).

**Thursday 8 March 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**ZHAO Wei**(HEC Paris) :__Optimal bridge players among separated networks.__- AbstractAbstract: This paper studies the optimal bridge problem among multiple separated separated networks and examines optimal targeting of players, groups and central planner. We find that the optimal choice (new links connect with other groups) of the group coincides with the individual’s rational choice. But, the best choice for the central planner may be different from the individual’s rational choice. We have shown how player’s centrality is going to be affected due to combination of separated networks, and how this is related to the self-loops and Bonacich centrality of these separated networks. We construct an exact index to identify the key bridge players linking up whom will mostly increase aggregate equilibrium effort and aggregate equilibrium welfare, and we find that the key bridge players may consist of neither each group’s key players nor central players. We provides its implications on company merge, optimal targeting, community merge and network design.

**Thursday 1 March 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**HA-HUY Thai**(Université de Cergy ) :__A Not so Myopic Axiomatization of Discounting__**Jean-Pierre Drugeon**- AbstractThis article builds an axiomatization of inter-temporal trade-offs that makes an explicit account of the distant future and thus encompasses motives related to sustainability, transmission to offsprings and altruism. The focus is on separable representations and the approach is completed following a decision-theory index based approach that is applied to infinite dimension streams. This enlightens the limits of the commonly used flat tail intensity requesites for the evaluation of utility sequences: in this article, these are supersed and replaced by an axiomatic approach to optimal myopy degrees that in its turn precedes the determination of optimal discount. The overall approach is anchored on the new and explicit proof of a temporal decomposition of the preference orders between the distant future and the close future itself directly anchored on the determination of the optimal myopia degrees. The argument is shown to provide a novel understanding of temporal biases with the scope for a distant future bias when the finite dimensional gets influenced by the infinite dimensional. The reference to robust orders and pessimism-like axioms finally allows for determining tractable representations for the indexes.

**Thursday 15 February 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**CHONÉ Philippe**(CREST) :__Partial exclusivity__**joint with Laurent Linnemer and Thibaud Vergé**- AbstractThis papers offers a new rationale for exclusive agreements. Long-term business partners have a common interest to agree on an option to deal on an exclusive basis, while keeping the possibility to revert to a competitive process (auction) should the surplus of an internal deal turn out to be low. Partial exclusivity occurs in equilibrium in the sense that competition takes place with positive probability. Although there is no rent extraction à la Aghion and Bolton (1987), such lock-up agreements harm competitors (and total welfare) by depriving them of business opportunities. Compared to Bulow and Klemperer (1996), the possibility of long-term contracting calls into question the efficacy of auctions relative to negotiations

**Thursday 8 February 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R1-15, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**MACÉ Antoine**(CNRS/GREQAM) :__On the Weights of Sovereign Nations__**Rafael Treibich**- AbstractWe study the design of voting rules for committees representing heterogeneous groups (countries, states, districts) when participation in the committee is voluntary. While efficiency recommends weighting groups proportionally to their stakes, we show that accounting for participation constraints entails overweighting some groups, those for which the incentive to participate is the lowest. When collective decisions are not enforceable, cooperation is enabled by the satisfaction of more stringent constraints, that may require granting a veto power to certain countries. The model has important implications for the problem of apportionment, the allocation of voting weights to countries of varying populations, where it provides a rationale for setting a minimum representation for smaller countries.

**Thursday 1 February 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**LARAKI Rida**(CNRS et Lamsade) :__Acyclic Gambling Games__**J. Renault**- AbstractWe consider two-player zero-sum stochastic games where each player controls his own state variable living in a compact metric space. The terminology of the title comes from gambling problems where the state of a player represents its wealth in a casino. Under natural assumptions (such as continuous running payoff and non expansive transitions), we consider for each discount factor the value $v_\lambda$ of the $\lambda$-discounted stochastic game and investigate its limit when $\lambda$ goes to 0 (players are more and more patient). We show that under a strong acyclicity condition, the limit exists and is characterized as the unique solution of a system of functional equations: the limit is the unique continuous excessive and depressive function such that each player, if his opponent does not move, can reach the zone when the current payoff is at least as good than the limit value, without degrading the limit value. The approach generalizes and provides a new viewpoint on the Mertens-Zamir system coming from the study of zero-sum repeated games with lack of information on both sides. A counterexample shows that under a slightly weaker notion of acyclicity, convergence of $(v_\lambda)$ may fail.

**Thursday 25 January 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**BANERJEE Abhijit**(MIT) :__The Efficient Deployment of Police Resources: Theory and New Evidence from a Randomized Drunk Driving Crackdown in India__**Esther Duflo and Dan Keniston**

**Thursday 18 January 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**PRADELSKI Bary**(ETH Zurich) :__Title: Micro influence and macro dynamics of opinion formation__**Bernhard Clemm von Hohenberg and Michael Maes**- AbstractSession organisée par Francis Bloch (Paris 1/PSE) Abstract: Social media platforms, comment boards, and online market places have created unprecedented potential for social influence and resulting opinion dynamics such as polarization. We propose an encompassing model that captures competing micro-level theories of social influence. Conducting an online lab-in-the-field experiment, we observe that individual opinions shift linearly towards the mean of others' opinions. From this finding, we predict the macro-level opinion dynamics resulting from social influence. We test our predictions using data from another lab-in-the-field experiment and find that opinion polarization decreases in the presence of social influence. We corroborate these findings with large-scale field data.

**Thursday 11 January 2018 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**VEIEL Rafael**:__Strategic Type Spaces__- AbstractUniversal type spaces provide a representation of players’ information that allows to derive the set of interim correlated rationalizable (ICR) actions in any game. They also provide the appropriate structure for the study of ICR sensitivity to information. However, the resulting procedure to compute the set of ICR actions in a given game is often unnecessarily complex, as the universal type space contains types that are redundant for this game. Furthermore, no representation equivalent to the universal type space is known for alternative solution concepts such as interim independent rationalizability (IIR). We offer a way to study the set of rationalizable (in the sense of ICR or IIR, or other) actions in any given game. We introduce strategic type spaces as minimal representations of all strategically relevant information that allow to derive the set of rationalizable actions in this game. These strategic type spaces are characterized by a network structure, and provide an adequate framework for studying sensitivity of strategic behavior to information.

**Thursday 14 December 2017 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan 75014 Paris
**ELLISON Sara**(MIT) :__Match Quality, Search, and the Internet Market for Used Books__**joint with S. Ellison**- AbstractAbstract : This paper examines the effect of the Internet on markets in which match-quality is important, including an analysis of the market for used books. A model in which sellers of unusual objects wait for high-value buyers to arrive brings out match quality and competition eects through which improved search technologies may increase both price dispersion and social welfare. A reduced-form empirical analysis nds support for a number of more nuanced predictions of the model in the context of the used book market, exploiting both cross-sectional dierences across books and time-series dierences in the wake of Amazon's acquisition and incorporation of a large used book marketplace. The paper develops a framework for structural estimation of a model based on the theory. The estimates suggest that the shift to Internet sales substantially increased both seller prots and consumer Surplus.

**Thursday 7 December 2017 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan, 48 bd Jourdan - 75014 Paris
**CARAYOL Nicolas**(Université de Bordeaux ) :__Evaluating the underlying qualities of items and raters from a series of reviews__**joint with M. Jackson**

**Thursday 23 November 2017 12:30-13:30**- salle R1-13, campus Jourdan, 48 bd Jourdan - 75014 Paris
**PREVET Antoine**(PSE/Université Paris 1) :__Information Management by a Budget constrained Principal__- AbstractThis paper contributes to the debate on transparency in the public sector by considering one of its major features: a limited budget. In a principal-agent model with moral hazard and bounds on transfers, I study an information design problem where the principal can either choose to be transparent and fully reveal information before the agent takes action, or remain opaque. On the one hand, transparency makes it possible for the principal to engage her limited budget only when the expected gain is worth the implementation cost. On the other hand, opacity does not allow for tailor-made contracts but rather ensures optimal incentives. I show that transparency is more likely to be optimal for the principal when the task is less valuable and the budget is lower. Furthermore, the optimal information structure is derived, requiring that the agent be told only what action to undertake.

**Thursday 16 November 2017 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan, 48 bd Jourdan - 75014 Paris
**MOULIN Hervé**(University of Glasgow ) :__Fair Mixture of Public Outcomes__**joint with H. Aziz and A. Bogomolnaia**- AbstractAbstract : We revisit probabilistic voting under dichotomous preferences where, as on Facebook, agents report that they like/dislike every outcome. We focus on two often conflicting normative concerns. Minorities should not be crushed by the opposing majority; and the size of the support for a given outcome should increase its weight: numbers matter. The Unanimous Fair Shares property adresses both concerns by giving to any group of like-minded agents an influence proportional to its size. Individual Fair Shares weakens UFS by only guaranteeing to each agent a 1/n-th influence on the outcome (where n is the total number of agents). Given that we cannot combine Efficiency, Incentive Compatibility (Strate- gyproofness) and Unanimous, or even Individual, Fair Shares, we propose second best mechanisms achieving two of these three design goals. The Conditional Utilitarian rule, a simple variant of the classic random dictator, is Strategyproof and guarantees Unanimous Fair Shares. It is much easier to compute and more efficient than the familiar Random Priority rule. In numerical simulations its inefficiency is consistently low. The efficient Egalitarian rule guarantees Individual Fair Shares and is Excludable Strategyproof: this weakens Strategyproofness by ensuring that an agent is excluded from consuming those public outcomes she reportedly dislikes. But numbers do not matter: the rule treats a unanimous group of agents exactly as if it contains a single agent. The efficient Nash rule (maximizing the product of utilities) offers much stronger welfare guarantees than both above, in particular it achieves core stability if any group of agents can enforce any outcome with a probability proportional to its size. But the rule fails even the excludable form of Strategyproofness. We also uncover several challenging open questions
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 2 November 2017 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan, 48 bv Jourdan - 75014 Paris
**BERVOETS Sébastien**(CNRS/GREQAM ) :__Doping and competition uncertainty__

**Thursday 19 October 2017 12:30-13:30**- salle R2-20, campus Jourdan, 48 bd Jourdan - 75014 Paris
**LOVO Stefano**(HEC Paris) :__Herding and Crowdfunding (joint with Brett Green).__- AbstractAbstract: We explore a sequential fund-raising mechanism with common values and an all-or-nothing clause (i.e., a target level of funds must be raised in order for the project to be implemented). We show that in the maximum truth-telling equilibria the presence of the all-or nothing clause decreases the probability of abstention cascade but it increases the probability of pledging cascades. Compared to the socially optimal outcome these campaign lead to an excessive implementation of projects. Social optimum can be restored by allowing backers to opt in and out at the end of the campaign.

**Thursday 5 October 2017 13:00-14:00**- salle R1-11, campus Jourdan - 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**ELLISON Sara**(MIT) :__Costs of Managerial Attention and Activity as a Source of Sticky Prices: Structural Estimates from an Online Market__- AbstractAbstract: We study price dynamics for computer components sold on a price-comparison website. Our fine-grained data—a year of hourly price data for scores of rival retailers—allow us to estimate a dynamic model of competition, backing out structural estimates of managerial frictions. The estimated frictions are substantial, concentrated in the act of monitoring market conditions rather than entering a new price. We use our model to simulate the counterfactual gains from automated price setting and other managerial changes. Coupled with supporting reduced-form statistical evidence, our analysis provides a window into the process of managerial price setting and the microfoundation of pricing inertia, issues of growing interest in industrial organization and macroeconomics. JEL Codes: L11, C73, D21, L81
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 28 September 2017 13:00-14:00**- salle R1-11, campus Jourdan - 48 bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**RIVERA Thomas**(HEC) :__Robust Mechanisms for the Regulation of Bank Risk__- AbstractThis paper aims at designing mechanisms for the regulation of bank risk (probability of default) that can guarantee robustness to large misspecifications of the regulators information regarding the bank's assets. Assuming banks can (on average) discern the true level of risk of the other regulated banks, I construct a robust mechanism that allows the regulator to bound the worst case probability of bank failure by any arbitrary amount. In doing so, I show that any informationally robust mechanism must necessarily require banks to issue subordinated debt to other regulated banks and must provide a way to guarantee a minimal probability of joint bank failure between at least two of the banks. We show how the regulator can achieve the latter objective by providing a single bank with an explicit guarantee against losses in the event that another bank fails and how, when coupled with a minimum subordinated debt requirement and interest rate ceiling, such a guarantee can ensure an arbitrarily low probability of any regulated bank's failure. Finally, I discuss how the results are affected when banks have biased estimations of other banks' risks and the best bound on bank risk that the regulator can achieve given such biases.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 21 September 2017 12:00-13:00**- salle R1-13, campus Jourdan, 48 boulevard Jourdan - 750145 Paris
**BOBTCHEFF Catherine**(PSE) :__Insurance Pools for Undiversifiable Risks__**David Alary (TSE) and Carole Haritchabalet (Université de Pau)**- AbstractAbstract : This paper discusses the decision of the European Commission not to renew the antitrust exemption for the setting up of syndicates in the insurance industry. Pools are constituted to provide insurance for undiversifiable and/or new risks for which insurers with private expertise are capacity constrained. Our objective is to study if such syndicates improve insurance supply. Organizing this supply amounts to sharing a common value divisible good between capacity constrained and privately informed agents with a reserve price. Pools turn out to operate as a uniform price auction with an “exit/re-entry” option that we compare to a discriminatory auction where no specific agreements are needed. Both auction formats lead to different coverage/premium tradeoffs. If at least one insurer provides an optimistic expertise, the pool offers both lower premiums and higher coverage. This result is reversed when all insurers are pessimistic about the risk. Static comparative results with respect to capacity constraints and reserve price are provided

**Thursday 29 June 2017 13:00-14:00**- salle R2-01, campus Jourdan, 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**BOUACIDA Elias**(PSE) :__Indifference or Indecision, an Experimental Investigation using Choice Correspondences__- AbstractAbstract. The completeness axiom is a staple in economics, despite its lack of both: 1. Normative appeal, as pointed by Aumann (1962); 2. Descriptive investigation, apart from two experiments using lotteries by Danan and Ziegelmeyer (2006) and Cettolin and Riedl (2016). In this paper, I am tackling the second question. I show how to elicit a choice correspondence -- in contrast to a choice function, as usually done in experiments -- in an incentive compatible way, while keeping the revealed preferences methodology. This allows the elicitation of -- some -- indifference and -- some -- indecision (aka incompleteness) in experiments using Eliaz and Ok (2006)'s characterization, which provides a lower bound on indecision. This procedure is applied to the choice between four incentivized tasks to be performed in the laboratory. I observe some indifference for a majority of subjects and some indecision for around a quarter of them.

**Thursday 22 June 2017 13:00-14:00**- salle R1-11, campus Jourdan, 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**HE Yinghua**(Rice) :__Strategic Mistakes: Implications for Market Design Research__**Yeon-Koo Che (Columbia) and Georgy Artemov (Melbourne**- AbstractAbstract. A field data from Australian college admissions shows that a non-negligible fraction of applicants choose strategies (or rank-ordered lists) that are unambiguously dominated, but that the majority of these mistakes are payoff irrelevant. In keeping with this result, we develop a theory suggesting that the presence of such mistakes jeopardizes the identication method based on truthful reporting hypothesis under a (seemingly) strategy-proof mechanism, but leaves the method based on weaker stability condition relatively unscathed. Monte Carlo simulation further confirms this point and quantifies the differences between these two methods in the structural estimation of preference parameters and in a hypothetical counterfactual analysis.

**Thursday 18 May 2017 13:00-14:00**- salle R1-11, campus Jourdan, 48 boulevard Jourdan, Paris 14e
**PEJSACHOWICZ Leonardo**(Paris 1) :__Breadth versus Depth.__- AbstractAbstract. We consider a fundamental trade-off in search: when choosing between multiple unknown alternatives, is it better to learn a little about all of them (breadth) or a lot about a single one (depth)? In choice settings where a distribution is exogenous, we find that breadth is optimal for ``small'' problems and that depth is optimal for ``large'' ones. But in IO settings, where firms endogenously choose distributions, we find breadth to be always optimal. Finally, we consider extensions to fat-tails and correlation, and find that in these extensions, breadth is superior.

**Thursday 20 April 2017 13:00-14:00**- campus Jourdan, 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**BASTIANELLO Lorenzo**(Paris 1) :__Target-based solutions for Nash bargaining__

**Thursday 6 April 2017 13:00-14:00**- salle F, bâtiment G, campus Jourdan, 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**BIRO Peter**( (Hungarian Academy of Science)) :__Stable Project Allocation under Distributional Constraints__**joint with Agoston and Szanto**- AbstractAbstract. In a two-sided matching market when agents on both sides have preferences the stability of the solution is typically the most important requirement. However, we may also face some distributional constraints with regard to the minimum number of assignees or the distribution of the assignees according to their types. These two kind of requirements can be challenging to reconcile in practice. Our research is motivated by two real applications, a project allocation problem and a workshop assignment problem, both involving some distributional constraints. We used integer programming techniques to nd reasonably good solutions with regard to the stability and the distributional constraints. Our approach can be useful in a variety of di erent applications, such as resident allocation with lower quotas, or controlled school choice.

**Thursday 30 March 2017 13:00-14:00**- Salle R1-11, Campus Jourdan, 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**STEPANOV Sergey**(Higher School of Economics ) :__Reputation and information aggregation.__

**Thursday 23 March 2017 13:00-14:00**- Salle R1-11, Campus Jourdan, 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**WOODWARD Kyle**(University of North Carolina ) :__Equilibrium and Approximation in Auction-Like Models__- AbstractI define auction-like models with continuum actions to satisfy a number of conditions which are met in common auction contexts, when action spaces are appropriately constrained. In these models, I prove that there exists a monotone pure-strategy Bayesian-Nash euqilibrium. The proof of equilibrium existence constructs equilibrium as a limit of equilibria of nearby discretized models, which implies that utility-relevant observable functions of actions are converging in probability to the continuum-action limit. The conditions defining auction- like models are intuitive: first, bidder utility cannot be adversely affected by small upward deviations; second, with small deviations bidders can guarantee themselves nearly the utility at a limit of strategies in the limit of the deviated strategies; third, if one bidder is discontinuously worse off in a limit of strategies, some other bidder is occasionally better off. Under mild additional conditions, the action space constraints are irrelevant, and the limiting strategies are an equilibrium in the unconstrained continuum-action model. I use these results to prove the existence of pure-strategy equilibria in divisible-good pay-as-bid auctions with private information, heterogeneous agents, and generic decreasing value functions. Equilibrium approximation implies that the distribution of observed allocations and seller revenue in discrete auctions may be close to the distribution of these outcomes predicted by the divisible-good model.

**Thursday 16 March 2017 13:00-14:00**- Salle R1-11, Campus Jourdan, 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**JEHIEL Philippe**( PSE) :__Investigation with forgetful liars__- AbstractAbstract: I consider environments in which an individual not telling the truth does not remember which lie he made and I propose modelling how such an individual forms a belief about his past lie using the apparatus of the analogy-based expectation equilibrium so that after performing a lie the individual considers that he lied according to the aggregate distribution of lie performed in equilibrium across all possible observations that the individual may possible make. I study the extent to which how asking subjects several times about their information and committing to harsh punishments in case of contradiction allows to elicit information and implement the first-best ouctome. Various extensions allowing for a mix of rational and forgetful liars are considered.

**Thursday 9 March 2017 13:00-14:00**- salle R1-11, Campus Jourdan, 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**GOMES RENATO**(TSE) :__Drip Prices and Missed Sales__**joint with TIROLE Jean**- AbstractAbstract: Firms often sell a basic good as well as ancillary ones. Hold-up concerns have led to regulations on ancillary good pricing such as price transparency and caps on the add-on price. The hold-up narrative, however, is an inaccurate description of many retail settings in which add-ons are offered below cost (e.g. free shipping), and of the infrequent card surcharging in countries where the “no-surcharge rule” was lifted. We argue that the key to unifying these conflicting narratives is the seller’s concern about losing sales on the basic good. When the ancillary good is self-supplied (or equivalently supplied by a competitive upstream ancillary-good industry) and consumers are well-informed about prices (attentive or repeat customers), the firm passes through the cost of the ancillary good to the consumer if the (endogenous) markup on the basic good is small, but absorbs partly or fully any ancillary good cost increase if this markup is high, so as not to run the risk of losing sales. The ancillary good is always sold below cost. When the ancillary good is provided by a supplier with market power, the latter has an incentive to jack up the intermediate price so as to benefit from the seller’s cost absorption strategy. We show that the optimal regulation is a price floor on the ancillary good, equal to the intermediate price. We also show that absent regulation, there is an overprovision of the ancillary good when the ancillary good is supplied by a two-sided platform. When consumers are initially unaware of the ancillary good price, the price of the basic good acts as a signal of the ancillary good price: A high price for the basic good makes the firm more wary of missed sales and thus reassures the consumer about the ancillary good price. We study the optimal regulation

**Thursday 2 March 2017 13:00-14:00**- salle DSS, bâtiment B, Campus Jourdan, 75014 paris
**TOMALA Tristan**(HEC Paris) :__Competitive Information Design. Work in progress.__**joint with Frédéric Koessler (PSE) and Marie Laclau (PSE).**- AbstractAbstract. We study games between n information designers, each of whom can perform a statistical experiment about a piece of information, the pieces being independent. They aim at persuading a decision-maker to take their most favorable action. For such games with discontinuous payoffs, we show that there exists a (sub-game perfect) equilibrium with either an infinite number of messages or randomization over finite statistical experiments. We characterize the equilibrium distributions of actions for rectangular games in which the optimization problem of the decision-maker is separable across designers. Rectangular games have a (sub-game perfect) equilibrium in pure strategies with a finite number of messages.

**Thursday 2 February 2017 13:00-14:00****The session was canceled.****BOUACIDA Elias**(PSE) :__*__

**Thursday 19 January 2017 13:00-14:00****TALLON Jean-Marc**(PSE) :__Asset Allocation and Trade under Heterogeneous Ambiguity Aversion__**with S. Mukerji and H. Ozsoylev**- AbstractAbstract: We seek to explore several financial puzzles in a single model, that departs from basic portfolio choice models only in that it accomodates ambiguity and ambiguity sensitve preferences. The three anomalies are (1) the asset allocation puzzle wich is the observation that professionnals' recommandations for portfolio holdings do not accord well with the mutual fund theorem, (2) departures from CAPM pricing in a systematic way and (3) large volume of trade after public annoucement of earnings. We propose a model where investors have smooth ambiguity preferences and asset returns have ambiguous means. We show that investors optimally hold portfolio with a different mix of risky assets, due to their heterogeneous ambiguity aversion. This heterogeneity also leads, in an equilibrium model, to trade upon the arrival of public information (about the dividends).

**Thursday 12 January 2017 13:00-14:00****FLECKINGER Pierre**(Ecole des Mines - PSE) :__Game of Frauds__**T. Lafay and C. Monnier**

**Thursday 15 December 2016 13:00-14:00****COUANAU Quentin**(PSE) :__Cooperation versus competition under ambiguity aversion__- AbstractAbstract : We study a principal-agent model with two agents and two positively correlated tasks. We assume that agents face ambiguity (or knightian uncertainty) regarding the tasks and are averse to ambiguity. Our focus is on whether the presence of ambiguity aversion favors cooperation or competition between agents, as compared to risk aversion. We show that the effect of ambiguity is twofold. It lowers the power of incentives making agents' wages less sensible to performance, while it increases significantly the cost of implementing relative incentives. As a consequence, the principal does not necessarily choose relative incentives, even in situations where they would always be optimal under risk. Allowing for agents to cooperate, we show that ambiguity aversion favors cooperation between agents while risk aversion favors competition.

**Thursday 8 December 2016 12:30-13:30**- Salle F, Bât G
**HAGENBACH Jeanne**(CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique) :__Communication with Evidence in the Lab__**E. Perez-Richet**- AbstractWe study communication with evidence in the lab. Our experimental design involves a collection of sender-receiver games with various payoffs and permits partial disclosure. We use local and global properties of the sender's incentive graph to uncover behavioral regularities and explain performance across games. Sender types whose interests are aligned with those of the receiver fully disclose, while sender types whose interests are not aligned with those of the receiver remain silent or partially disclose. When partially disclosing senders mostly disclose favorable pieces of evidence and hide unfavorable ones. But the cognitive cost of partial disclosure, as measured by response times, is higher for both senders and receivers. Receivers take evidence into account and tend to be skeptical about vague messages in games whose graph is acyclic. They perform better in acyclic games, whereas senders perform better in cyclic games.

**Thursday 1 December 2016 13:00-14:00**- Matching with Ownership
- AbstractAbstract : We consider a hybrid model at the intersection between the standard two-sided matching market as proposed by Gale and Shapley (1962) and a housing market as proposed by Shapley and Scarf (1974). Two types of agents have to be matched to a common side of objects. Agents of one type have preferences that depend on the object they are matched to but also which agent of the other type is matched to this object. To investigate the link with the two-sided matching literature, we define a natural concept of ownership structure that determines for each possible triplet of match, which agent owns the object. We then define a pairwise stability property of matchings with respect to an ownership structure i.e. where only an owner could ask another agent to join his current object. We first show that there are ownerships structures for which no such matching exists. However, we show that it exists for one-sided ownership structures i.e. when agents of one type are always the owners. In this framework, we show that contrary to a standard two-sided matching market, there may not be any core matching even if stable matchings exist. The existence is restored if we assume that agents of the side always owning the objects have lexicographic or separable preferences. To investigate the link with a housing market model, we define an initial allocation of the objects to one agent and define the standard notion of core in this framework. Even with one sided initial allocation, we show that the latter may also be empty. However, with such initial allocations, we show that there always exists a Pareto-efficient matching that cannot be blocked by coalitions of size two.

**Thursday 17 November 2016 13:00-14:00****HERINGS Jean-Jacques**(Maastricht University) :__Equilibrium and Matching under Price Controls__- AbstractThe paper considers a one-to-one matching with contracts model in the presence of price controls. This set-up contains two important streams in the matching litera- ture, those with and those without monetary transfers, as special cases and allows for intermediate cases with some restrictions on the monetary transfers that are feasible. An adjustment process that ends with a stable outcome is presented, thereby prov- ing the existence of stable outcomes. The process contains the deferred acceptance algorithm of Gale and Shapley (1962) and the approximate auction mechanism of Demange, Gale, and Sotomayor (1986) as special cases. The paper presents a no- tion of competitive equilibrium, called Dreze equilibrium, for this class of models, an extension of the concept as developed by Dreze (1975) for economies with divisible commodities subject to price controls. It is shown that Dreze equilibrium allocations are equivalent to allocations induced by stable outcomes. One implication is the ex- istence of Dreze equilibria. Another implication is the equivalence of a competitive equilibrium concept and the concept of stable outcomes that is valid with and with- out monetary transfers as well as when monetary transfers are limited.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 10 November 2016 13:00-14:00****SALAMANCA Andrés**(TSE) :__The value of mediated communication__- AbstractAbstract: Kamenica and Gentzkow (2011) consider a model in which a sender chooses a public communication device for signaling his information to an uninformed receiver, who then takes an action that aects the welfare of both individuals. In their model, the sender is fully committed to truthfully communicate the signal to the receiver, so that they abstract from incentive compatibility issues. By considering mediated communication, we provide an analytical framework overcoming this overly restrictive assumption. Specically, we are able to characterize incentive constraints by a set of linear inequalities, which allows to formulate the sender's problem as a linear programming problem. As a result, we can use an alternative geometric approach based on duality theory to transform the sender's problem into a simplied problem without incentive constraints that can be solved using concavication

**Thursday 3 November 2016 13:00-14:00****ISPANO Alessandro**(University Cergy-Pontoise) :__Competitive pricing and quality disclosure to cursed consumers__- AbstractAbstract: We study the disclosure decision and price-setting behavior of competing firms in the presence of cursed consumers, who fail to be sufficiently skeptical about a firm's quality upon observing non-disclosure of quality-relevant information. We show that neither competition nor the presence of sophisticated consumers necessarily offer protection to cursed consumers. Exploitation arises if markets are vertically differentiated, if there are many sophisticated consumers, and if it is more likely ex ante that product quality is high. Information campaigns that seek to educate consumers may encourage exploitation and decrease social welfare. Mandatory disclosure laws restore efficiency, but at the cost of redistributing rents from consumers to firms. Our simple model delivers a rich set of positive results, captures important markets, like those for food and consumer finance, and speaks to several recent policy initiatives aimed at consumer protection.

**Thursday 13 October 2016 12:30-13:45****LAMBERT-MOGILIANSKY Ariane**(PSE) :__Phishing for phools - Dynamic consistency under non-classical uncertainty__**V.I. Danilov and V. Vergopoulos**- AbstractIn this paper we develop an expected utility theory in the context of non-classical(quantum) uncertainty. We replace the classical state space with a Hilbert space which allows introducing the concept of quantum lottery. Within that framework we formulate sufficient and necessary axioms in terms of choice behavior and establish a representation theorem. We show that demanding the consistency of choice behavior conditional on new information is equivalent with the von Neuman-Luder postulate applied to beliefs. As a consequent we find that rational choice behavior can be consistent with non-commutativity in updating. Finally, we discuss the value of our results for behavioral economics

**Thursday 6 October 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**DOSIS Anastasios**:__*__

**Thursday 29 September 2016 12:45-13:45****REDLICKI Bartosz**(U of Cambridge) :__Spreading Disinformation.__- AbstractIt is a common tactic, e.g., for political parties, to manipulate information without any official verification and then spread it by word of mouth. I develop a theoretical model which combines elements of Bayesian persuasion and cheap talk. An individual, called “manipulator”, manipulates information by designing an information policy, which is modelled by Bayesian persuasion. The information then diffuses via a chain of cheap talk communication in a population of agents with heterogeneous preferences. The manipulator’s objective is to spread disinformation so that as many agents as possible take high actions. He needs to take into account that his information policy can affect the agents’ own incentives to manipulate information during its diffusion. The manipulator’s optimal information policy has a high degree of manipulation if the majority of agents have a large upward bias. On the other hand, he may set a lower degree of manipulation in order to make the information more credible to agents with no upward bias or to improve information diffusion between agents with different preferences.

**Thursday 23 June 2016 12:45-13:45****GABAIX Xavier**(NYU Stern) :__tba__

**Thursday 16 June 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**SEROR Marlon**(University of Bristol) :__A Theory on the Evolution of Civic Culture and Political Cycles__- AbstractWe argue in this paper that political cycles in democracies impede the diffusion of civic values, thereby contributing to a persistent political instability. Indeed, we build a theory on the evolution of political cycles under repeated majoritarian elections whenever civic values are transmitted inter-generationally. We first establish that cycles in public expenditures result from asymmetric information on incumbents' civic attitude. We then show that recurrent suboptimal increases in the public provision weight on average less on the cultural transmission strategies of the agents with low civic values. This is because the latter have on average a lower propensity to contribute to the public provision, and consequently suffer less from the higher taxes induced by the cycles. Thus, cycles of a sufficiently high magnitude persist because they create weak civic majorities in which informed voters are not majoritarian. At the opposite, low magnitude cycles may not impede the formation of a majority of informed civic voters. The preceding cycles are then transitory and civic norms consolidate once they disappear. Finally, we suggest that the composition of the cycling expenditures matters as well in explaining the diffusion of civic values.

**Thursday 9 June 2016**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**ZACCOUR Georges**(HEC Montréal) :__TBA__

**Thursday 2 June 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**BRETON Michèle**(HEC Montréal) :__Mergers in Nonrenewable Resource Oligopolies and Environmental Policies: A green paradox__- AbstractWe examine the profitability of horizontal mergers within nonrenewable resource industries, which account for a large proportion of merger activites worldwide. We focus on the case of a tripoly where each firm owns a private resource stock of the resource, and firms compete in quantities. We show that a merger is profitable when the resource stock owned by each firm is small enough. We also consider an endogenous merger process and show that monopolization is profitable when the resource stock of each firm is small enough. In the case where pollution is generated by the industry's activity, we show that an environmental policy that increases firms' production cost or reduces the price received by firms can deter a merger and therefore result in larger industry emissions than under a laisser-faire scenario. The impact of such an environmental policy on merger profitability generally depends on the level of the resource stocks. When the stocks are large enough, a tax on extraction reduces the losses from a horizontal merger.

**Thursday 26 May 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**KOESSLER Frédéric**(PSE) :__tba__

**Thursday 19 May 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**MONTERO Juan Pablo**(PUC-Chile) :__Bundled Discounts and Foreclosure in Wholesale Markets__**Enrique Ide**- AbstractCan a multi-product firm offer bundled-discounts to foreclose a more efficient single-product supplier? We show that the degree of downstream competition is key. Bundled-discounts are successful in depriving single-product rivals of scale economies only to the extent that buyers are disorganized and their valuations heterogeneous. This holds when suppliers deal directly with final consumers, or when they sell to retailers that compete intensely in downstream markets, but it is lost in the case of retail monopolies. These results are robust to alternative timing assumptions and different ways to model scale economies.

**Thursday 12 May 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**RITZBERGER Klaus**(IAS Vienna) :__The Curse of Poverty and the Blessings of Wealth__- AbstractIf productivity in a society is low, then the only equilibrium involves inefficiently selfish (autarkic) behavior. If productivity is sufficiently high, then there are several equilibria that realize substantial welfare gains through reciprocal behavior. Equilibria for productive societies are distinguished by how they treat the wealth distribution. While conservative societies preserve the distribution, egalitarian behavior further improves welfare by transfers. Yet, both conservative and egalitarian (productive) societies exclude the poorest, even though that involves a welfare loss. So, there are a social and an individual poverty trap. The first is technological, the second behavioral.

**Thursday 14 April 2016 12:45-13:45****ENACHE Andreea**(EUI, Florence) :__TBA__

**Thursday 7 April 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**VARDAR Boris**:__TBA__

**Thursday 31 March 2016 12:45-13:45****The session was canceled.****LAMBERT-MOGILIANSKY Ariane**(PSE) :__Dynamic consistency of expected utility under non-classical(quantum) uncertainty__**Danilov V.I. and V. Vergopoulos**- AbstractIn this paper we develop an expected utility theory in the context of non-classical(quantum) uncertainty. We replace the classical state space with a Hilbert space which allows introducing the concept of quantum lottery. Within that framework we formulate sufficient and necessary axioms in terms of choice behavior and establish a representation theorem. We show that demanding the consistency of choice behavior conditional on new information is equivalent with the von Neuman-Luder postulate applied to beliefs. As a consequent we find that rational choice behavior can be consistent with non-commutativity in updating. Finally, we discuss the value of our results for behavioral economics.

**Thursday 24 March 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**BLOCH Francis**(PSE) :__The formation of partnerships in social networks__**Bhaskar Dutta, Stephane Robin et Min Zhu**- AbstractThis paper analyzes the formation of partnerships in social networks. Agents randomly request favors and turn to their neighbors to form a partnership where they commit to provide the favor when requested. If favors are costly, agents have an incentive to delay the formation of the partnership. In that case, we show that for any initial social network, the unique Markov Perfect equilibrium results in the formation of the maximum number of partnerships when players become infinitely patient. If favors provide benefits, agents rush to form partnerships at the cost of disconnecting other agents and the only perfect initial networks for which the maximum number of partnerships are formed are the complete and complete bipartite networks. The theoretical model is tested in the lab. Experimental results show that a large fraction of the subjects (75\%) play according to their subgame perfect equilibrium strategy and reveals that the efficient maximum matching is formed over 78\% of the times. When subjects deviate from their best responses, they accept to form partnerships too early. The incentive to accept when it is optimal to reject is positively correlated with subjects' risk aversion, and players employ simple heuristics -- like the presence of a captive partner -- to decide whether they should accept or reject the formation of a partnership.

**Thursday 17 March 2016 12:30-14:30**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment E, rez-de-chaussée, salle 101
**BONNET Florian**(PSE) :__Information Design: The Random Posterior Approach (1)__**GEEROLF François**(UCLA) :__Paretos from Production Functions (2)__- Abstract(1)Information affects behavior by affecting beliefs. Information design studies how to disclose information to a group of players to incentivize them to behave in a desired way. This paper is a theoretical investigation of information design, culminating with a representation theorem and a fundamental application of it. We adopt a random posterior perspective, viewing information design as belief manipulation rather than information disclosure. The representation theorem shows that it is as if the designer manipulated beliefs in a specific way, shaping the approach in games, as did Kamenica and Gentzkow (2011) in one-agent problems. The representation theorem can also be implemented in specific problems, for example in the beauty contest and multiple-agent problems. We focus on an application that we dub the Mother's Problem.

(joint with J. Perego and I. Taneva)

(2)This paper shows that Pareto distributions can arise from production functions rather than from the distribution of primitives. A version of Garicano (2000)’s knowledge-based production hierarchies microfounds such a production function. It generates under very limited assumptions on the distribution of primitives (here, agents’ skills), Pareto distributions for span of control of CEOs as well as intermediary managers, and in particular Zipf’s law for firm sizes when the number of layers of management becomes large. This breakdown of the aggregate firm size distribution receives important empirical support in the French matched employer-employee administrative data. This novel justification of Pareto distributions can shed a new light on why outcomes are often so out of proportion compared to underlying primitives. For example, it provides a framework to study the recent rise in top income inequality. The analysis also has striking implications on the literature on firm heterogeneity: Pareto distributions are in fact the benchmark distributions arising in the case of perfect homogeneity, while heterogeneity in primitives should instead be backed out in the deviations from Pareto distributions.

**Thursday 10 March 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**VENEL Xavier**(Paris 1 et PSE) :__Dynamical strategic interaction in social networks__- AbstractWe consider a dynamical model of influence with a set of non-strategic agents and two strategic agents. The non-strategic agents are organized in a fixed network describing how they influence each other. The strategic agents have opposite opinion and try to drive the opinion of the society by targeting key-players in the network. We formulate this problem as a two-player zero-sum stochastic games allowing the strategic agents to change their target at every stage of the game. We prove the existence of the uniform value: if the player are sufficiently patient, both players can guarantee the same mean-average opinion without knowing the exact discount factor.

**Thursday 18 February 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**FAVART Thomas**(PSE) :__Collusion in Capacity Under Irreversible Investment__- AbstractThis work studies the possibility of collusion under irreversible investment in production capacity. The irreversibility of investment has two effects. It reduces the profitability of short run deviation, as the deviating firm has to invest in order to increase its capacity. It also creates a long run effect. Once the deviating firm has invested, it is committed to its new capacity. The deviation may thus lead to a preemption of the punishing firm. When the firms become more patient, the short run profitability of a deviation increases whereas the long run profitability is reduced. When the second effect dominates, collusion is harder to sustain for more patient firm. This contrasts with the literature on collusion. Finally, this work shows that the smallest firm has the most incentives to deviate.

**Thursday 11 February 2016 12:45-13:45****HERNANDEZ Penelope**(Valencia) :__Conflict and segregation in networks: individual preferences and social influence__- AbstractWe examine the interplay between a person's individual preference and the social influence others exert. We provide a model of network relationships with conflicting preferences, where individuals are better off coordinating with those around them, but not all prefer the same action. We test our model in an experiment, varying the level of conflicting preferences between individuals. Our findings suggest that preferences are more salient than social influence, under conflicting preferences: subjects relate mainly with others who prefer the same. This leads to two undesirable outcomes: network segregation and social inefficiency. The same force that helps people individually hurts society.

**Thursday 4 February 2016 12:45-13:45****LAMY Laurent**:__On the benefits of set-asides__**Philippe Jehiel**

**Thursday 28 January 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**NAX Heinrich**:__A behavioral study of « noise » in coordination games__**Michael Mäs**- Abstract‘Noise’ in this study, in the sense of evolutionary game theory, refers to deviations from prevailing behavioral rules. Analyzing data from a laboratory experiment on coordination in networks, we tested ‘what kind of noise’ is supported by behavioral evidence. This empirical analysis complements a growing theoretical literature on ‘how noise matters’ for equilibrium selection. We find that the vast majority of decisions (96% ) constitute myopic best responses, but deviations continue to occur with probabilities that are sensitive to their costs, that is, less frequent when implying larger payoff losses relative to the myopic best response. In addition, deviation rates vary with patterns of realized payoffs that are related to trial-and-error behavior. While there is little evidence that deviations are clustered in time or space, there is evidence of individual heterogeneity.

**Thursday 21 January 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**RIVERA Thomas**(HEC) :__Incentives and the Structure of Communication__- AbstractThis paper analyzes the incentives that arise within an organization when communication is restricted to a particular network structure (e.g., a hierarchy). We show that restricting communication between the principal and agents may create incentives for the agents to misbehave when transmitting information and tasks throughout the organization. Such incentives can render the principal's most preferred outcome infeasible and therefore introduces a trade off between the cost of communication borne by the principal and the benefit of curbing incentives to deviate induced by the communication structure. To remedy this issue, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions on the topology of the network of communication such that restricting communication to a particular network does not restrict the set of outcomes that the principal could otherwise achieve. In this sense, we show that for any underlying incentives and any outcome available when communication is unrestricted, there exists a (finite) communication scheme restricted to a particular network that implements this outcome (i.e., does not induce agents to misbehave in the communication phase) if and only if that network satisfies our conditions

**Thursday 14 January 2016 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 10
**BEHRINGER Stefan**:__Public Good Provision with many Agents: The k-success technology__**Yukio Koriyama, Ecole Polytechnique**- AbstractIn this paper, we consider a class of public good provision problems in which the production function takes the form of k-success technology, an extension of the direct provision technology considered in Behringer (2013). These models are suitable to describe the free-rider problems in which there are a large number of agents who are both users and beneficiaries of a public good at the same time, e.g. open-source software or social networks. We provide results on asymptotic efficiency which connect a negative result of Mailath and Postlewaite (1990) and a positive result of Hellwig (2003), as well as a set of simple examples which allow us welfare comparison with the standard technologies.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 17 December 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**LE CHAPELAIN Alexis**(Science-po) :__*__

**Thursday 10 December 2015 12:45-13:45****RAI Birendra**:__Preference Domains and Bilateral Bargaining: An Experiment__- AbstractTheoretical results and experimental findings from competitive settings suggest that agents with other-regarding preferences (ORP) often behave as if they have self-regarding preferences. We say an institution (game form) is `robust' wrt ORP if the above holds. We experimentally explore whether and when such robustness arises in non-competitive environments using a series of ultimatum games where proposer's monetary payoff upon rejection varies. The data provides some insights into when and why robustness holds wrt which type of ORP.

**Thursday 26 November 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 10
**IARIA Alessandro**(CREST) :__Estimating Demand Parameters with Choice Set Misspecification__- AbstractWe describe methods to estimate demand parameters in the presence of choice set misspecification due to unobserved individual choice sets. We show that a consumer’s probability of making a choice from her true choice set can be written as the probability she makes the same choice from a universal choice set, an assumption commonly made in the empirical literature, less a bias term capturing the probability that she would choose any of the elements in her true choice set. We show how to estimate models that avoid this bias under Logit demand using “sufficient sets,” instances where (observationally identical) individuals make at least two choices from the same unobserved choice set. Examples of sufficient sets include a variation of the Fixed Effect Logit approach due to Chamberlain (1980), using observed individual-specific purchase histories, and assuming common unobserved choice sets across individual purchases in a given retailer and time period. We illustrate these ideas using household-level scanner data exploiting variation in choice sets based on the introduction of a new product variety and heterogeneous product offerings across stores in the market for ketchup in the UK. Our results show that accounting for choice set misspecification is critical for accurately estimating own- and cross-price elasticities of demand.

**Thursday 19 November 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**MARFAN Manuel**(PSE) :__Multidimensional Delegation__- AbstractWe study a principal agent model without transferable utility in which both the agent's private information and the decision to be made is multidimensional. We study properties of the optimal delegation set, that is, the set of actions that will be taken on equilibrium, and compare with the single dimensional case. Finally, we study the use of "constant caps" as seen in Frankel (2014), and obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for their optimality.

**Thursday 12 November 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**DOSIS Anastasios**(Essec) :__Nash Equilibrium in? Competitive Markets with Adverse Selection__- AbstractWe generalise the results of Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976). We define the generalised Rothschild - Stiglitz allocation (RSA), and we show that, in every possible market, if the RSA is efficient, it is also a pure Nash equilibrium. In markets in which the RSA is not efficient, we specify a broader than Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) class of environments in which no pure Nash equilibrium exists.

**Thursday 5 November 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment B, 1er étage, salle CMH
**SZECH Nora**(Kalsruhe) :__*__

**Thursday 29 October 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment B, 1er étage, salle CMH
**HARRINGTON JOE**(Warton Business School) :__A Theory of Collusion with Partial Mutual Understanding__- AbstractUnlawful collusion is when Örms have a mutual understanding to coordinate their behavior for the purpose of achieving a supracompetitive outcome. Given the legal focus on mutual beliefs, this paper initiates a research program to explore how much and what type of mutual beliefs among Örms allows them to e§ectively collude. Focusing on price leadership as the collusive mechanism, it is assumed that Örms commonly believe that price increases will be at least matched but lack any shared understanding about who will lead, when they will, and at what prices. Su¢ cient conditions are derived which ensure that supracompetitive prices emerge. However, price is bounded below the maximal equilibrium price.

**Thursday 15 October 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment B, 1er étage, salle CMH
**TAKAHASHI Hidenori**(Mannheim) :__Strategic Design Under Uncertain Evaluations: Structural Analysis of Design-Build Auctions__- AbstractI investigate firms’ competition over price and product design under uncertain design evaluations in the context of Design-Build (DB) auctions. Reviewers’ design evaluations contain uncertainty from a bidder’s perspective, leading luck to dampen differences in firms’ chances of winning. I model bidders’ behavior and show semiparametric identification of the model primitives. Uncertain evaluations reduce the expected price of design quality, and exacerbate an auctioneer’s uncertainty in auction outcomes. A simple adjustment in the auction mechanism may completely shut down the impact of uncertain evaluations on bidding incentives, restoring efficient allocations of projects.

**Thursday 8 October 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment B, 1er étage, salle CMH
**BOUACIDA Elias**(PSE) :__An application of behavioral welfare economics to consumption data__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 18 June 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**WREN-LEWIS Liam**(PSE) :__*__

**Thursday 11 June 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**COMBE Julien**(PSE) :__The Design of Teacher Assignment : Theory and Evidence__**Co-author(s) : Olivier Tercieux et Camille Terrier**

**Thursday 4 June 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**DARGNIES Marie Pierre**(Université Paris-Dauphine) :__Gender Di fferences in Reactions to Feedback and Willingness to Compete__**Co-author(s) : Noémi Berlin**- AbstractIn Western societies, it is generally known men have a greater taste for competition than women. However, the determinants of the decision to enter competitions are still not fully understood. Providing feedback on relative performance reduces the gender gap in competitive entry. The aim of this paper is twofold. We rst evaluate how participants update their beliefs after receiving feedback informing them whether their performance is below or above the median performance. Second, we are interested in how men and women react to this information in terms of competitive entry. Our rst result is that participants, and women in particular, react more strongly to the feed- back they receive than would a Bayesian agent. As far as entry into the competition is concerned, below-median participants adjust their entry decision according to the competition they expect to face, while above-median participants do not. However, the behavior behind these results is quite di erent for men and women: women mainly re- act to information on their own performance, while men seem to respond more to their beliefs over the competition they will face. Moreover, most of the e ect of feedback and the information regarding the level of the competition on the decision to compete seems to operate via beliefs.

**Thursday 28 May 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**SEVERINOV Sergei**(University of British Columbia) :__Optimal Mechanisms for Budget Constraint Buyers__**Co-author(s) : A. Boulatov**- AbstractThe paper deals with the mechanism design for selling to buyers who have known budget constraints. With asymmetric budgets, our problem is that of asymmetric optimal mechanism design. We derive and characterize the optimal mechanism. It belongs to one of two classes. When the budget differences are small, the optimal mechanism discriminates only between high-valuation buyers for whom the budget constraint is binding. All low valuations buyers are treated symmetrically despite budget differences. In case of large budget differences, the optimal mechanism discriminates in favor of buyers with small budgets when the valuations are low, and it discriminates in favor of buyers with larger budgets when the valuations are high.

**Thursday 7 May 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**CAMARA Fanny**(Goethe University of Frankfurt) :__When Competition Hinders Transparency: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry__

**Thursday 9 April 2015 12:45-13:45****RENOU Ludovic**(University of Essex) :__Revealed preferences over risk and uncertainty__**Co-authors : Matthew Polisson & John K.-H. Quah)**- AbstractConsider a finite data set where each observation consists of a bundle ofcontingent consumption chosen by an agent from a constraint set of such bundles. We develop a general procedure for testing the consistency of this data set with abroad class of models of choice under risk and under uncertainty. Unlike previous work, we do not require that the agent has a convex preference, so we allow for risk loving and elation seeking behavior. Our procedure can also be extended to calculate the magnitude of violations from a particular model of choice, using an index firstsuggested by Afriat (1972, 1973). We then apply this index to evaluate different models (including expected utility and disappointment aversion) in the data collected by Choi et al. (2007). We show that more than half of all subjects exhibiting choice behavior consistent with utility maximization are also consistent with models of expected utility and disappointment aversion.

**Thursday 26 March 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**BONTEMPS Christian**(Toulouse) :__*__

**Thursday 19 March 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**MARLATS Chantal MARLATS**(Paris 2-Assas) :__Observation delays in teams__**Co-authors : Sid Gordon & Lucie Ménager**- AbstractWe study a dynamic team problem in which two players contribute to a common project that leads to a success with some probability increasing with effort. Players are informed of the success or the failure of their partner with a time lag. We interpret this delay as a technological constraint on information transmission. We find that the equilibrium payoff follows a regular cyclical pattern and the strategies are bang bang. This contrasts with the case without delay in which payoffs and efforts are constant over time. Also, there exists an asymmetric equilibrium if and only if the time lag is sufficiently small.

**Thursday 5 March 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**BERGES Alexis**(PSE) :__Investigating the impact of uncertainty on firms with dynamic costs on the electricity market__- AbstractWe provide an empirical analysis of the French electricity market. Specifically, we look at the impact of uncertainty on supplier strategies and take this as evidence that dynamic costs matter. Our approach to separate out the uncertainty from market demand expectations and predictability of renewables generation is novel. Both proxies for uncertainty used are new, uncertainty from market demand is inferred from the prediction errors that firms make in a demand estimation and uncertainty from renewable production is computed in a bottom-up approach from local weather forecasts. Instead of opting for a time series regression, we understand all hourly auctions as a cross-sectional dataset and control for the time of the day by using continuous transition variables for daytime periods. Similarly, we control for seasonality using continuous variables rather than dummies. Thereby, we are able to leverage our dataset and increase the sample size for each of our regression and improve the precision of our estimates.

**Thursday 12 February 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**JEHIEL Philippe**(PSE) :__Investment strategy: Sampling, categorizing, and selection bias__- AbstractIn most cases, it is hard to have a good understanding of all possible (probablistic) consequences of investment decisions. I propose an approach in which decision makers first categorize projects based on similarity as perceived from small samples, then get access to aggregate statistics about the effect of the investment in the various categories of projects, and finally make investment decisions in randomly drawn projects based on these aggregate statistics. I compare the resulting outcome to that arising in a benchmark Bayesian model and highlight the mistakes of the selection bias type that such heuristics induce. I also apply the approach to multi-player contexts so as to shed light on the so called no trade theorem.

**Thursday 5 February 2015 12:45-13:45****GORELKINA Olga**(Max Planck Institute, Bonn) :__Selling Money on Ebay__**Co-author(s) : Alia Gizatulina**- AbstractTo determine whether subjects display social preferences in the field, we conduct a trading experiment with a pool of German Ebay users. Acting as a seller, we offer Amazon gift cards with values from 5 to 500 euros. Randomly arriving buyers, the subjects of our experiment, make take-it-or-leave-it price offers. From each offer we infer the fraction of the gains from trade that a buyer proposes to leave to the seller. We find that a large numbers of offers correspond to approximately equal sharing between the buyer and the seller. The amount of money at stake has no significant effect on the relative prices offered. More experienced buyers are more likely to display behavior consistent with the theoretical model.

**Thursday 15 January 2015 12:45-13:45****GORDON Sidartha**(Sciences Po) :__Information Choice and Diversity: The Role of Strategic Complementarities__- AbstractWe study a class of games where players face restrictions on how much information they can obtain on a common payoff-relevant state, but have some leeway in covertly choosing the dependence (or similarity) between their signals, before simultaneously choosing actions. Using a new dependence stochastic ordering between signals, we show that each player prefers and chooses information that is more dependent on the information of other players whose actions are either isotonic and complements with her actions or antitonic and substitutes with her actions. Similarly, each player prefers and chooses information that is less dependent on the information of other players whose actions are antitonic and complements with her actions or isotonic and substitutes with her actions. We then provide sufficient conditions for certain information structures to arise in equilibrium, in particular for public information and for private information. We discuss applications to collective action, oligopolies, supply chains, financial markets, and spec- ulative currency attacks. Equilibrium information structures may be inefficient. Making which signals were chosen (but not their realizations) publicly observable may restore efficiency.

**Thursday 8 January 2015 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**GAGNEPAIN Philippe**(PSE - Paris 1) :__Knowledge Spillovers in Cost-Reduction Incentives__**Co-author(s) : Luis Aguiar**- AbstractThe goal of this paper is to identify and measure the relevance of knowledge spillovers in the French urban transport industry, where most regulated transportation networks are operated by firms that belong to the same company. We build and estimate a structural cost regulation model under incomplete information where the service is regulated by an authority and is provided by a single operator that may be owned by a larger company. We identify the knowledge spillovers which arise for some operators being linked to a same group, and see how they influence the firms’ decisions of exerting effort in order to reduce their operating costs. Our model provides us with estimates of the operators’ inefficiencies, the effort of the managers and the knowledge spillovers. Our results show that knowledge spillovers are indeed relevant for the existing industrial groups present in the French urban transport industry. Simulation exercises provide evidence of significant reductions in total operating cost following the enlargement of industrial groups and/or mergers between existing groups.

**Thursday 27 November 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**BLOCH Francis**(PSE -Paris 1) :__The formation of partnerships in social networks__**Co-autheur : Bhaskar Dutta**

**Thursday 20 November 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**HOUNGBONON Georges Vivien**(PSE) :__The impact of entry and merger on the pricing of multiproduct firm__- AbstractIn this paper, we design a hedonic pricing model to estimate the dynamic impact of entry and merger on access and usage prices in a context of mixed bundling between two independent services with respectively high and low valuations. Using telecommunications tariffs data from OECD operators and a double difference matching estimation strategy, we find that entry does not raises the access price of the services, irrespective of their valuation and whether in standalone or in bundle. However, merger does increase the bundle access price for the low valuation service while decreasing the standalone access price for the high valuation service. Although both the standalone and bundle usage prices of the low valuation service are also not affected by entry, they fall following a merger. For the high valuation service, entry decreases its standalone usage price while raising its bundle usage price. The inverse holds for merger.

**Thursday 13 November 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**SCHOLZ Eva-Maria**(Université Catholique de Louvain) :__How to license a downstream technology when upstream firms are capacity constrained?__- AbstractIn this paper we study the relationship between capacity constraints and licensing strategies. To do so, we focus on the licensing strategy of an outside patentee who licenses a process innovation to the downstream sector of a vertical Cournot oligopoly. Downstream firms source their input requirements from an upstream sector in which a subset of firms is capacity constrained. It is shown that (1) the patentee licenses large innovations via per-unit royalty contracts and small innovations via fixed-fee contracts; (2) an increase in the number of capacity constrained upstream firms makes it more likely that the patentee opts for a per-unit royalty contract; (3) depending on the number of capacity constrained upstream firms, privately optimal per-unit royalty contracts may maximise economic welfare.

**Thursday 6 November 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**HAGENBACH Jeanne**(Polytechnique) :__COMMUNICATION WITH EVIDENCE IN THE LAB__**Co-author : E. Perez-Richet**- AbstractWe examine strategic communication in sender-receiver games where senders can only transmit information using verifiable statements. Applying the method of Hagenbach, Koessler, Perez-Richet [Ecta14], we represent players’ incentives by a graph mapping which type of a sender would like to be believed as which other type, the masquerading graph. In theory, when this graph is acyclic, the receiver can deter the use of any vague message by attributing it to a type that no potential sender of this message would like to be. If receivers make such skeptical inferences, full revelation of information obtains in equilibrium. On the contrary, when the masquerading graph is cyclic, the use of vague messages is harder to discourage and full disclosure more difficult to sustain. This paper investigates the relevance of this graphical distinction in the lab. Our experimental design involves sender-receiver games with various payoffs and allows examining how subjects use and interpret evidences for the different resulting graphs. We show that information is more often revealed in games whose graph is acyclic than cyclic, and that receivers interpret vague evidences skeptically in most cases. While senders understand well when their type should be identified, they however fail using vague messages to fool receivers as finely as they could.

**Thursday 16 October 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**MARFAN Manuel**(PSE) :__*__

**Thursday 9 October 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**ALAIN Marie-Laure**(Polytechnique) :__The Impact of Retail Mergers on Food Prices: Evidence from France__**Co-author(s) : Claire Chambolle, Stephane Turolla and Sofia B. Villas-Boas**- AbstractThis paper analyzes the impact of a merger in the French retail sector on food prices, using a consumer panel data. We perform a difference-in-differences analysis by comparing price changes in stores for which the local market structure is affected by the merger to unaffected stores. In addition, we empirically investigate economic forces behind the observed price changes. On average, we find that the merger significantly raised competitors’ prices contemporaneously with merging firms’ price increases. Further, we show that competitor prices increase more in local markets that experience larger structural changes in concentration and chain differentiation.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 2 October 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**STEPANOV Sergey**(Higher School of Economics, Moscow) :__Biased Performance Evaluation in A Model of Career Concerns: Incentives versus Ex-Post Efficiency__

**Thursday 25 September 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**GOMES Renato**(Toulouse School of Economics) :__Competitive Screening under Heterogeneous Information__**Co-author(s) : Daniel Garrett and Lucas Maestri**- AbstractWe study competition in price-quality menus when consumers privately know their valuation for quality (type), and are heterogeneously informed about the offers available in the market. While firms are ex-ante identical, the menus offered in equilibrium are ordered so that more generous menus leave more surplus uniformly over types. More generous menus provide quality more efficiently, serve a larger range of consumers, and generate a greater fraction of profits from sales of low-quality goods. By varying the mass of competing firms, or the level of informational frictions, we span the entire spectrum of competitive intensity, from perfect competition to monopoly.

**Thursday 3 July 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**MOULIN Hervé**(Rice University and Glasgow University) :__Segregation, Entropy, and Proportional Rationing__

**Thursday 19 June 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**ERDAMAR Bora**(PSE) :__On Manipulation from an Unacceptable Social Choice to an Acceptable One__**Co-author(s) : Remzi Sanver and Shin Sato**- AbstractNon-manipulability in collective decision making problems has been analyzed mainly through the axiom of strategy-proofness. In this paper, we propose a new concept of non-manipulability. We postulate that each agent misreports his preferences if and only if the misrepresentation leads to a change of the social outcome from an unacceptable one for this agent to an acceptable one. For the formulation of this idea the preference-approval framework is used. Possibility and impossibility results for the existence of a non-manipulable rule are provided.

**Thursday 12 June 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**LEVIN Dan**(Ohio State University) :__Separating Bayesian Updating from Non-Computational Reasoning: An Experimental Investigation__**Co-author(s) : James Peck et Asen Ivanov**- AbstractThrough a series of decision tasks involving colored cards, we provide separate measures of Bayesian updating and non-computational reasoning. We apply these measures to (and are the first to study) a common-value Dutch auction. This format is more salient than the strategically equivalent first-price auction and silent Dutch formats in hinting that one should condition one’s estimate of the value on having the highest bid. Both Bayesian updating skills and non-computational reasoning skills are shown to help subjects correct for the winners curse, as does the saliency of the active-clock Dutch format.

**Thursday 5 June 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**TREIBICH Rafael**(Polytechnique) :__Welfare Egalitarianism with Other-Regarding Preferences__- AbstractWe study the fair allocation of a one dimensional and perfectly divisible good when individuals have other-regarding preferences. A social ordering function associates any profile of ordinal preference relations with a complete ordering of all possible allocations. In both a model of average and positional externalities, we characterize a class of social ordering functions which satisfy appealing efficiency, fairness and consistency properties. These rankings require giving full priority to the worst off agent in the economy, where individual welfare is measured in a specific constructed way.

**Thursday 22 May 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**ISPANO Alessandro**(TSE & CREST) :__Competing over Gains, Cooperating over Losses__**Co-author(s): Peter Schwardmann (Toulouse School of Economics).**- AbstractWe let experimental subjects play a social dilemma game and vary whether payoffs are framed as losses or as gains. Subjects cooperate substantially more in the loss domain. We account for this finding with a theory that features noisy equilibrium behavior and reference-dependent risk preferences. We estimate a structural econometric model that incorporates risk preferences into an augmented cognitive hierarchy model. The estimated risk preference parameters are in line with evidence from individual decision-making tasks. Our model fits the experimental data well and is consistent with other puzzling results in the experimental literature on games played over losses. These findings have several important applications, including price competition between firms during recessions or concessions in climate change negotiations.

**Thursday 15 May 2014 12:45-15:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**LACLAU Marie**(PSE) :__Bayesian games with multiple priors__**Co-author : Ludovic Renou (Essex).**- AbstractWe study Sender-Receiver games where the Receiver has multiple priors over the states of the nature (the Sender may have a single or multiple priors). We assume full Bayesian updating and that the Receiver has max-min preferences. We establish necessary and sufficient conditions for a splitting lemma to hold. We derive a characterization of the equilibrium payoffs of the Sender.

**Thursday 24 April 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**REGUAND Mar**(Stanford GSB) :__Blowin' in the Wind: Sequential Markets, Market Power and Arbitrage__**Co-author(s): Koichiro Ito (Boston University)**- AbstractWe study strategic behavior of wind farms in electricity markets, and examine their dynamic adjustments through sequential markets. Wind production is uncertain and volatile, with the degree of uncertainty being reduced over the day. Therefore, sequential forward markets can improve market efficiency through information updating. However, pre-existing distortions such as market power and limited arbitrage may distort incentives to reveal accurate production forecasts. By using micro-level data in the Spanish electricity market, we show that wind farms exploit a forward market price premium, overstate their production over 20% at the day-ahead market, and only slowly adjust their commitments to expected production, increasing the dynamic inefficiencies from wind misplanning. Consistent with the premium being driven by market power, wind farms that have market power do not exploit the price premium, whereas competitive fringe farmers do the arbitrage. Our results show how pre-existing distortions can have unintended consequences in the market, making the integration of wind power even more challenging.

**Thursday 10 April 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**BOUSQUET Léa**(PSE) :__Time Inconsistency and Naivety within Hotelling Competition__- AbstractA monopoly offering a two-part tariff contract to time inconsistent consumers (both sophisticated and naive) do not exploit the time inconsistency bias but the naivety bias. Moreover, with perfect competition, firms do not succeed anymore to exploit the naivety bias even if an allocation inefficiency remains. So, we are interested to study the impact of Hotelling competition on the exploitation of these bias. We adapt DellaVigna and Malmendier (2004) framework to study the impact of imperfect competition and introduction of transport costs. These costs can be introduced at the contract period or at the consumption period. At the contract period, we observe that the competition even imperfect erases the exploitation of the naivety bias but the introduction of the transport costs conducts to a distortion between consistent and time inconsistent consumers. At the consumption period, transport costs generate an heterogeneity between consumers, firms are no longer able to provide a perfect commitment to sophisticated consumers. Consequently, allocation with both sophisticated and naive are not efficient.

**Thursday 27 March 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**WATSON Joel**(UC San Diego) :__Contractual Chains__- AbstractThis paper examines a model in which individuals contract with one another along the branches of a ?xed network and then select veri?able productive actions with externally enforced transfers. Special cases of the model include most settings of contracting with externalities that have been studied in the literature. The model allows for a type of externality that the previous literature has not explored fully—where a party is unable to contract directly with others whose actions affect his payoffs. The paper investigates the prospects for ef?cient outcomes under various contract-formation protocols (“contracting institutions”) and network structures. There are contracting institutions that always yield ef?cient equilibria for any connected network. A critical property is that the institutions allow for sequential contract formation or cancellation. The equilibrium construction features assurance contracts and cancellation penalties.

**Thursday 20 March 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**LEFEBVRE Perrin**(PSE) :__Lobbying, Informational Polarization and Political Contributions__**Co-author(s) : David Martimort**- AbstractCompeting interest groups can use two instruments to influence a decision maker: information supply, and monetary contributions. When engaging in informational lobbying, groups have to choose which elements of a political issue they want to focus on. Each element is ex ante more or less likely to serve each group's cause. We identify a tradeoff between the quality and the quantity of information the decision maker can get from group: the decision maker prefers ex ante neutral information, but it is more easy to induce groups to gather information about a priori favorable arguments. As a result of this tradeoff, the organization of lobbying will exhibit informational polarization, each group at equilibrium specializing in fields of expertise more likely to support their respective interest. Contributions do not qualitatively modify this result, but have an impact on groups' incentives to supply information. A group more efficient in the use of political contributions will tend to provide less information, while the effect of his competitors strength on a group's informational strategy is ambiguous. Depending on groups' efficiency in the use of contributions, information and contributions can appear as complement or substitute instruments.

**Thursday 13 March 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**DE BELSUNCE Henri**((International Max Planck Research School for Competition and Innovati) :__On Essential Patents and Vertical Structure in the Context of Cumulative Innovation__- AbstractThis paper focuses on the incentives to innovate in the context of cumulative innovation. It shows that the presence of essential patents exerts a detrimental effect on the innovation incentives of vertically integrated firms that hold a license reading on the essential technology and compares this effect under a property vs. liability regime. An application of the model shows that the effect also holds for licensees of patent pools hat feature a partial termination clause, e.g. MPEG-2. The partial termination clause extends the standard grantback requirement of patent pools to include related patents of pool licensees. The paper helps to explain the move of the DOJ in 2006 from a property rule to a liability rule for patent litigation cases involving essential patents, since the negative externality on cumulative innovation is exacerbated when courts employ a strict property rule for patent litigation cases. Furthermore, it suggests a possible explanation for the drop in innovation rates of pool outsiders who research in the technological proximity of the pool. Also, the paper gives a possible explanation for why vertically integrated firms are overrepresented (underrepresented) among the pool members (outsiders) as compared to pools that do not feature this clause. The model lends support to the finding that innovations made by outsiders are of higher quality then those of pool members. The pro-competitive effects, on which the Department of Justice based its positive ruling for the partial termination clause in the case of the MPEG-2 pool, are also a feature of the model.

**Thursday 6 March 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**SCHROEDER David**(Birkbeck College, University of London) :__A new measure of equity and cash flow duration: The duration-based explanation of the value premium revisited__- AbstractThis paper proposes a new method for estimating an expected equity and cash flow duration for individual shares. In analogy to bond duration, we derive duration from a share’s price sensitivity to changes in the discount rate. To ensure that the duration estimates are forward-looking, expectations of future cash flows are taken from equity analysts. In line with the duration-based explanation of the value premium, we find that value stocks have shorter durations than growth stocks. However, there is no significant relation between a firm’s cash flow duration and stock returns, which implies that cross-sectional differences in the firms’ cash flow timing cannot explain the value premium. Instead, we show that the firms’ equity duration can explain the cross-section of stock returns, and the value premium in particular.

**Thursday 13 February 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**LEHLE Vincent**(Paris Dauphine) :__Afriat’s Theorem for Indivisible Goods__**Co-author : Françoise Forges**- AbstractWe identify a natural counterpart of the standard GARP for demand data in which goods are all indivisible. We show that the new axiom (DARP, for “discrete axiom of revealed preference”) is necessary and sufficient for the rationalization of the data by a well-behaved utility function. Our results complement the main finding of Polisson and Quah, Am. Econ. J.: Micro. 5(1) p.28-34 (2013), who rather minimally modify the original consumer problem with indivisible goods so that the standard GARP still applies.

**Thursday 6 February 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**HOUNGBONON Georges Vivien**(PSE) :__Is there an optimal level of competition for maximal investment? Empirical evidence from the mobile telecommunications industry__**Co-author : François JEANJEAN (Orange, Regulatory Affairs)**- AbstractIn this paper, we use data from the mobile telecommunications industry to test whether there is an optimal level of competition which guarantees maximal investment in new technologies. Using the Lerner index of monopoly power as a measure of competition, we find an optimal level of competition at 62%. That is, investment rises from a low level of competition up to 62% and then falls above this level. The optimal level of competition is higher for firms which supply access to the fixed telecommunications network (65%), and lower for market leaders (56%). For laggards, the optimal level is much higher, at 80%. Our results suggest that antitrust agencies should consider the welfare implications of their competition policies when the Lerner index is close to 38%.

**Thursday 23 January 2014 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**TSUR Matan**(University of Vienna) :__Financial Contracts and Bargaining__- AbstractI consider a firm with many projects; the output of each one will be sold to a prospective buyer. The terms of trade will be determined via some bargaining procedure. Projects require financing and the firm can borrow against the future revenue from the sales. I study how the firm’s financial obligations to an outside investor(s) influence the bargaining outcomes with prospective buyers. Does the firm prefer to bundle projects together and finance them jointly, e.g. taking out a single loan tied to the joint revenue, or finance them separately, e.g. with separate loans tied to different projects? The answer depends on the types of securities that are available. When constrained to standard debt, the firm extracts a larger share of the surplus by financing projects separately. But the advantage of separate financing is not preserved when the firm can design more complicated securities- convex combinations of debt and equity. The optimal securities are also characterized.

**Thursday 12 December 2013 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**BOYER Pierre**(Mannheim) :__Efficiency, Welfare, and Political Competition__**Co-author: Felix Bierbrauer**- AbstractWe study political competition under the assumption that voters have private information on their valuation of publicly provided goods. Preferencesare quasilinear in private goods consumption. We show that equilibrium policies are surplus-maximizing. This is in contrast to the conventional wisdom that incentive compatibility constraints make it harder to obtain surplus-maximizing outcomes. Our result extends to a Mirrlees (1971)-model of income taxation. In this model, however, the surplus-maximizing outcome can be interpreted as a political failure to provide for welfare-enhancing redistribution among individuals who differ in their productive abilities.

**Thursday 5 December 2013 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**TAKAHASHI Yuya**(Mannheim) :__Testing for Equilibrium Multiplicity in Dynamic Markov Games__**Co-authors : Taisuke Otsu and Martin Pesendorfer.**- AbstractThis paper proposes several statistical tests for finite state Markov games to examine the null hypothesis that the data are generated from a single equilibrium. We formulate tests of (i) the conditional choice probabilities, (ii) the steady-state distribution of states and (iii) the conditional distribution of states conditional on an initial state. In a Monte Carlo study we find that the chi-squared test of the steady-state distribution performs well and has high power even with a small number of markets and time periods. We apply the chi-squared test to the empirical application of Ryan (2012) that analyzes dynamics of the U.S. Portland Cement industry and test if his assumption of single equilibrium is supported by the data.

**Thursday 28 November 2013 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**HOLLARD Guillaume**(Paris 1) :__Non-strategic players are the rule rather than the exception__- AbstractIndependent studies on experimental games provide converging, and puzzling evidence: a noticeable fraction of players behave in a non-strategic way. It is hard to believe that so many players act in way that is hard to reconcile with any theory of strategic behavior. This study is designed to understand why. We test commonly suggested explanations such as insucient stakes, lack of attention or misconceptions about the game. None appear to be entirely convincing. Using reaction-time data, we show that non-strategic subjects spend time thinking about the games and do pay attention to changes. Moreover, players classied as non-strategic in a first set of games continue to act non-strategically in subsequent games. Our results suggest that the existence of non-strategic players in one-shot games is a robust feature of human cognition. Bearing in mind that our subjects are international chess players, we wonder why their strategic chess-playing ability does not transfer to laboratory games. Theoretical and economic consequences are discussed.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 21 November 2013 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**COLLIARD Jean-Edouard**(European Central Bank) :__Monitoring the supervisors: optimal regulatory architecture in a banking union__- AbstractI study the optimal architecture of bank supervision in a federal system. A central supervisor relies on off-site monitoring to learn about a bank's soundness, and then decides whether she should perform an on-site inspection or whether it is better left to local authorities. Local supervisors are more efficient at performing on-site examinations, but do not internalize cross-border externalities. The optimal degree of supervisory centralization depends on the severity of these externalities, the opacity of the supervised bank and the specificity of its assets. Cross-border externalities are endogenous as in equilibrium investors react to the supervisory architecture. Better supervision leads to more financial integration, which worsens the incentives of local supervisors. The economy can be trapped in an equilibrium with low supervision and low integration, while a forward-looking design of the supervisory architecture would coordinate economic agents on a superior equilibrium.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 7 November 2013 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**TERCIEUX Olivier**(PSE) :__Efficiency and Stability in Large Markets__**Co-autheur : Y-K. Che**

**Thursday 31 October 2013 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**EHLERS Lars**(University of Montréal) :__Matching Markets under (In)complete Information__**Co-autheur(s): Jordi Masso**- AbstractWe introduce incomplete information to centralized many-to-one matching markets. This is important because in real life markets (i) any agent is uncertain about the other agents' true preferences and (ii) most entry-level matching is many-to-one (and not one-to-one). We show that given a common prior, a strategy prole is an ordinal Bayesian Nash equilibrium under incomplete information in a stable mechanism if and only if, for any true prole in the support of the common prior, the submitted prole is a Nash equilibrium under complete information in the direct preference revelation game induced by the stable mechanism.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 24 October 2013 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**TARNAUD Razvan**(Paris 1) :__Information Aggregation using Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule__- AbstractThe success of early prediction markets have urged for the developments of market structures more adapted to beliefs elicitation. Thus, market scoring rules are more and more used in the pursuit of this goal. Although, they are often implemented in terms of asset trading, they are equivalent to a sequential probability report process that is studied in this paper. For the logarithmic market scoring rule, it is proven that the sequence of probabilities reported by agents converges under some assumptions on the regularity of the utility functions and the small variations of the risk aversion levels. In a multiple period setting, if agents update their probability beliefs with their limit reports, the sequence of probability beliefs of those who have not quoted yet converge towards a unique probability forecast, provided that their risk aversion levels are high enough. Interpreting this process as a strategic game with incomplete information, it is demonstrated that it converges towards a local equilibrium at each period and a global one which aggregates the private information hold by agents.

**Thursday 10 October 2013 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**MONTEIRO Juan Pablo**(Pontificia Universidad) :__When do non-linear contracts deter the expansion of (in)efficient rivals?__- AbstractWe study the anti-competitive effects of non-linear contracts (e.g., two-part tariffs, rebates, quantity discounts) between a buyer and a dominant firm in the presence of small rivals wishing to expand. While it is known that in a rent-shifting environment with imperfect information two-part tariffs are no different than the exclusionary contracts of Aghion and Bolton, we show that alternative non-linear schemes can be remarkably different. Quantity discounts that work entirely through the spot market (such as rebates) prevent the buyer and the incumbent to commit ex-ante to the transfer of rents. The effect is so strong that these contracts are rarely anticompetitive; more so the larger the dominant firm's bargaining power and/or outside option are. The reason we see these contracts is because they can be used to prevent the expansion of inefficient rivals, or more generally, to redistribute rents ex-ante between the buyer and the dominant firm.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 3 October 2013 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**ROKETSKIY Nikita**(University College London) :__A Quantitative Analysis of the Used Car Market__- AbstractWe quantitatively investigate the allocative and welfare effects of secondary markets for cars. An important source of gains from trade in these markets is the heterogeneity in the willingness to pay for higher-quality (newer) goods, but transaction costs are an impediment to instantaneous trade. We explore how the income distribution affects this heterogeneity---income is an important determinant of willingness to pay for quality. Calibration of the model successfully matches several aggregate features of the U.S. and French used-car markets. Counterfactual analyses show that transaction costs have a large effect on volume of trade, allocations, and the primary market. Aggregate effects on consumer surplus and welfare are relatively small, but the effect on lower-income households can be large."

**Thursday 26 September 2013 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**MARTIN Daniel**(PSE) :__A Testable Theory of Imperfect Perception__- AbstractWe provide a new characterization of Bayesian expected utility maximization. The signature of the resulting theory is the impossibility of raising utility by switching wholesale from one action to another. We provide applications to robustness, to the recovery of utility from choice data, and to model classification.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 12 September 2013 12:45-13:45**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, rez-de-chaussée, salle 8
**KIMBALL Miles**(University of Michigan) :__Beyond Happiness and Satisfaction: Toward Well-Being Indices Based on Stated Preference__- AbstractThis paper proposes foundations and a methodology for survey-based tracking of well-being. First, we develop a theory in which utility depends on “fundamental aspects” of well-being, measurable with surveys. Second, drawing from psychologists, philosophers, and economists, we compile a comprehensive list of such aspects. Third, we demonstrate our proposed method for estimating the aspects’ relative marginal utilities — a necessary input for constructing an individual-level well-being index — by asking ~4,600 U.S. survey respondents to state their preference between pairs of aspect bundles. We estimate high relative marginal utilities not only for happiness and life satisfaction, but also for aspects related to family, health, security, values, and freedoms.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 18 July 2013 12:45-13:45****RICHTER Michael**(Yeshiva University) :__Mechanism Design With Budget Constraints__- AbstractThis paper finds welfare- and revenue-maximizing mechanisms for assigning a divisible good to a population of budget-constrained agents where agents' have independently distributed private valuations and budgets. Both of these optimal mechanisms feature a linear price for the good. The welfare-maximizing mechanism additionally has a uniform lump sum transfer to all agents and a higher linear price than the revenue-maximizing mechanism. This transfer increases welfare because it relaxes the key di culty in the aforementioned setting: agents with high valuations cannot purchase an effi cient amount of the good because of their budget constraints. The welfare-maximizing result can therefore be interpreted as a version of the second welfare theorem. I show that both optimal mechanisms can be implemented using dominant strategies. In addition, I consider extensions where I relax the independence condition and introduce linear production.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 13 June 2013 12:45-13:45****FUDENBERG Drew**(Harvard) :__Recursive Stochastic Choice__**Co-author(s): Tomasz Strzalecki**- AbstractThis paper provides axiomatic characterizations of two sorts of recursive stochastic choice rules, where the agent makes his current decisions using a forward-looking value function that takes into account his future randomizations. Both of the choice rules we examine generalize logistic choice and are equivalent to it in static problems. The rules differ in how the agent views future choice sets and how he views his future randomizations. One rule is equivalent to the discounted logit used in applied work, and exhibits a preference for exibility;" the other is error-averse" and penalizes the addition of undesirable choices to a menu.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 6 June 2013 12:45-13:45****BERGES Alexis**(PSE) :__Dynamics on the electricity market : supply function equilibria and__**Co-author(s): D. Martimort**- AbstractWe investigate the influence of technology on the solutions to supply function equilibria models for the electricity market. We first stress the importance of considering adjustment costs, i.e. costs that depend not only on the quantity produced but also on the speed at which production varies: C(q, dq/dt). For linear demand and stochastic demand shocks, we then solve for a monopoly and a symmetric oligopoly. Our solutions are unique and depend on the distribution of shocks, accounting for interday and intraday supply function variation. Our results provide strong predictions on the dynamic evolution of bids on the day-ahead electricity market. We introduce a novel selection rule to choose from the continuum of equilibria typically obtained in usual supply function equilibria models, namely a solution’s stability to adjustment costs.

**Thursday 23 May 2013 12:45-13:45****POSTLEWAITE Andrew**(U. Penn) :__Optimism and Pessimism with Expected Utility__**Co-author(s): David Dillenberger et Kareen Rozen**- AbstractSavage (1954) provides axioms on preferences over acts that are equivalent to the existence of a subjective expected utility representation. We show that there is a continuum of other expected utility" representations in which for any act, the probability distribution over states depends on the corresponding outcomes and is

**Thursday 16 May 2013 12:45-13:45****GORDON Sidartha**(Science Po) :__Figures of Speech and Informative Strategic Communication__- Abstract> We provide a class of tractable communication games where each sender > type chooses a possibly truth-distorting figure of speech, which the > receiver interprets before choosing an action. Because language is > inherently vague, a figure of speech mapping determines > informativeness of communication: Exaggeration results in better > information transmission than understatement. A sender's choice of a > figure of speech trades off the action he wants to induce and his > lying aversion. There can be between one and five equilibria, all of > them fully separating, yet only partially revealing, which can be > ranked by level of informativeness. At most two of these equilibria, > the less informative ones, are ironic. The other (at most three) > equilibria are straight-talking, either exaggerating or understated. > We find that a receiver may prefer a sender who is more dissimilar to > him, and also a sender who is less honest. He may prefer a language > that has more vagueness, and a sender who is less competent. Finally, > we study the limit of the equilibria as either (i) the language > vagueness vanishes or (ii) the lying aversion vanishes.

**Thursday 25 April 2013 12:45-13:45****DE CORNIERE Alexandre**(Oxford) :__Integration and Search Engine Bias__**Co-author(s): Greg Taylor (Oxford)**- AbstractCompetition authorities all over the world worry that integration between search engines (mainly Google) and publishers could lead to abuses of dominant position. In particular, one concern is that of own-content bias, meaning that Google would bias its rankings in favor of the publishers it owns or has an interest in, to the detriment of competitors and users. In order to investigate this issue, we develop a theoretical framework in which the search engine (i) allocates users across publishers, and (ii) competes with publishers to attract advertisers. We show that the search engine is biased against publishers that display many ads---even without integration. Although integration may lead to own-content bias, it can also reduce bias by increasing the value of a marginal consumer to the search engine. Integration also has a positive effect on users by reducing the nuisance costs due to excessive advertising. Its net effect is therefore ambiguous in general, and we provide sufficient conditions for it to be desirable or not.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 18 April 2013 12:45-13:45****LEFEBVRE Perrin**(PSE) :__Horizontal differentiation in lobbying__- AbstractThis paper considers strategic information gathering by competing interest groups that want to influence an uninformed decision-maker. Policy decision depends on different parameters, and groups can choose which parameters to specialize into when searching for information. Common wisdom wants groups to differentiate by specializing in different dimensions in order to soften competition. I show that differentiation is indeed the only equilibrium when dimensions are equally relevant; but far from softening competition, it increases the groups search cost without guaranteeing better policies. Compared to a situation where groups concentrate on the same information, differentiation favors the decision-maker and hurts interest groups. I also characterize the different types of equilibria when the decision-maker attributes different weights to different dimensions.

**Thursday 11 April 2013 12:45-13:45****LISKI Matti**(Aalto University School of Economics, Helsinki) :__Resource relationships__**Co-author(s): Reyer Gerlagh**- AbstractWe consider a model of resource dependence where only the seller knows the resource reserve. The model captures phenomena such as trust in the relationship and "bribing" for continuation through generous supplies. It also explains supply shocks in equilibrium: privately informed sellers have incentives to reveal their types too late through a supply disruption after which their exploit the consumers inability to immediately adjust demand. Two puzzles that a standard exhaustible-resource theory cannot explain are resolved: sellers have an incentive to overstate their resources rather than emphasize scarcity, and buyer's can switch to alternatives before exhausting the resource thereby leaving socially valuable resource in the ground.

**Thursday 4 April 2013 12:45-13:45****GENDRON-SAULNIER Catherine**(Université de Montreal) :__Information Sourcing in a Strategic Environment__- AbstractMany models in economics assume that individuals are endowed with exogenous information. Yet, individuals are making choices about what to learn and from which sources of information. In this paper, we study the sourcing decisions of individuals interacting in a game where the payoff function is quadratic and the information structure is gaussian. Our game is as follows. There are two players that have to make two sequential decisions. First, each player chooses his sources of information independently of, and simultaneously with, the other player. Then each player chooses an action after observing the realization of the signals send by the sources he chose in the first step, but not the signals of the other player (unless they have chosen the same information sources). As a motivating example we consider the situation of two oligopolists competing in price on a market for a differentiated good that acquire information on their demand function. We answer the question of whether the players make the same sourcing decisions and how similar the information they acquire is. We also perform some static comparative exercises and provide some welfare analysis.

**Thursday 21 March 2013 12:45-13:45****DE NIJS Romain**(Hass School of Business) :__An empirical assessment of the effects of the French Hadopi law__**Co-author(s) : C. Bellégo**- AbstractThis article uses the French anti-piracy law known as Hadopi, to study the effects of online piracy on movie box office performances. Results from difference-in-differences estimations indicate that the law increased admissions in movie theaters by 13 percent in France relative to control countries. Results also show that the Hadopi effects tend to decrease over time and are particularly strong for American movies that are the most heavily pirated movies. Last, the Hadopi effects are very unlikely to be explained by supply side reactions of the industry nor by a concomitant but unrelated to Hadopi positive shock in the French market for movies in theaters.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 7 March 2013 12:45-13:45****ZHOU Junjie**(PSE) :__Economics of Leadership and Hierarchy__- AbstractThis paper explores leadership within hierarchical organizations. For each hierarchy, I consider a dynamic signaling game in which each player observes only the actions of his direct superiors before choosing his action. At the top of the hierarchy are the leaders, who learn the state from nature. The hierarchy controls the flow of information and the timing of the game, and determines the equilibrium output and welfare. I show that the welfare-optimal hierarchy is the chain, because it maximizes the incentive of players to ``lead by example'' for their subordinates. The chain remains optimal even in the presence of verifiable or unverifiable costly information acquisition by the leaders. Lastly, I characterize optimal hierarchies when the number of layers or the number of leaders is limited. Applications to fund-raising are also discussed.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 28 February 2013 12:45-13:45****LECOUTEUX Guilhem**(Ecole Polytechnique) :__The formation of preferences in game theory__- AbstractFollowing Hausman's analysis of the concept of preferences (Preference, Value, Choice and Welfare, Cambridge University Press, 2012), we suggest modelling the formation of preferences in game theory, by introducing a distinction between utility --- defined as individual welfare --- and preferences --- defined as a subjective total comparative evaluation. We provide then an analytical framework where players can choose their own preferences before playing a game, and introduce the $\Sigma$ -equilibrium as a new notion of equilibrium in non cooperative game theory in order to model such a decision process. This notion of equilibrium seems to present more robust methodological foundations and also to have a better predictive power than Nash equilibrium in some standard games, and that is why we suggest it as a substitute to Nash equilibrium. We show that in a very large class of games, if we assumed that players choose their preferences in order to maximize in fine their utility, they will generally decide to maximize a different function than their own utility function: this means that for a very large class of games, maximizing one's own utility is self-defeating. We show that players choose their preferences in order to get a strategic advantage on the other players, such that the strategy that satisfies their preferences is in fact the strategy they would play if they were a Stackelberg leader. A direct corollary of this result in welfare economics is that --- if we assume that players are rational --- the preferences of the individuals are in general distinct from their utility: therefore preference satisfaction is not welfare, and we cannot easily infer individual welfare from choices and preferences.

**Thursday 21 February 2013 12:45-13:45****SCHUTZ Nicolas**(University of Mannheim) :__Cross-Border Price Effects of Mergers and Acquisitions - A Quantitative Framework for Competition Policy__**Co-auteurs : Holger Breinlich and Volker Nocke**- AbstractDecisions of national competition authorities have important effects on other jurisdictions. We provide a framework to quantify the domestic and cross-border effects of mergers, and to draw conclusions for the coordination of national merger policies. We develop a two-country model with many sectors. In each sector, producers vary in terms of their marginal costs, and are engaged in Cournot competition. We allow for pro?table mergers to take place subject to the non-violation of a given national competition policy. Because of trade costs and perceived differences in qualities between domestic and foreign products, mergers may have different consumer surplus effects in the home and the foreign country. We calibrate the model using data for the year 2002 for 167 manufacturing sectors in the U.S. and Canada, two well-integrated markets where cross-border effects of M&As are likely to be important. We choose parameters to match relevant moments in the data, including industry sales, concentration ratios and trade ?ows. We ?nd that merger decisions taken in isolation by national competition authorities lead to ine cient outcomes compared to a scenario where competition policy is coordinated, and that these ine ciencies are quantitatively important. While there is considerable variation across industries, we ?nd that in the majority of industries a merger approval policy based on domestic consumer surplus is too restrictive from the viewpoint of the neighboring country.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 14 February 2013 12:45-13:45****LASLIER Jean-François**(Ecole Polytechnique) :__Vote au pluriel: How people vote under different voting rules__- AbstractThe seminar presents a survey of recent research on voter behavior. Using traditional laboratory experiments, innovative "in situ" experiments, and on-line surveys, we observe how people vote under different voting rules. The goal of the investigation is two-fold. In an Institutional Design perspective, we want to understand the consequences of possible political institutions (who is elected ?). In a Political Psychology perspective, we want to understand the individuals' conception of the act of voting. The set of candidates being given, we describe what kind of candidates are favored by what kind of rules. As to voters, we find that they use heuristics and behave partly strategically and partly sincerely, the mixture depending on the detailled circumstances. We note that voters have both self-serving and ideological preferences over voting rules.

**Thursday 7 February 2013 12:45-13:45****GARRETT Daniel**(TSE) :__Dynamic Mechanism Design with Dynamic Arrivals and Changing Values__- AbstractI will discuss dynamic mechanism design settings where agents preferences evolve stocastically and where agents arrive over time. Agents need not participate at the arrival date and can be strategic with respect to the first date of participation in the mechanism. Profit-maximizing allocations, which maximize a “dynamic virtual surplus” are derived. Applications to the durable goods problem (see `Incoming Demand with Private Uncertainty’) and overselling of capacity in the airline industry (see `Overbooking’ with Jeff Ely and Toomas Hinnosaar) will be discussed.

**Thursday 24 January 2013 12:45-13:45****DAVE Chetan**(NYU Abu Dhabi) :__Confirmation Bias with Motivated Preferences__**co-authored with Gary Charness**- AbstractModels of confirmation bias as an individual decision making error predict systematic departures from Bayesian updating and can imply that no learning may ever take place. While some experimental evidence for a confirmation bias has been found, an implicit assumption in many stochastic economic models is that strategic (or market) pressures cause individuals to not exhibit systematic deviations from Bayesian updating. We investigate in the laboratory the effect of subtle background strategic considerations on signal extraction, finding that people are affected by the presence of motivated preferences (here a preference for one state having manifested). Our results suggest that players with motivated preferences over probabilistic end states deviate less from Bayesian updating. However, such players still exhibit a confirmation bias when the directions of updates are analyzed.

**Thursday 10 January 2013 12:45-13:45****JEONG HEO Eun**(University of Rochester) :__Probabilistic Assignment Problem with Multi-unit Demands: A Generalization of the Serial Rule and a Characterization__- AbstractAbstract: We study a probabilistic assignment problem when agents have multi-unit demands for objects. We first introduce two fairness requirements to accommodate di erent demands across agents and show that each of these requirements is incompatible with stochastic dominance efficiency (henceforth, we use the prefix sd" for stochastic dominance) and weak sd-strategyproofness, unless all agents have unitary demands. We next introduce a new incentive requirement which we call limited invariance. We explore implications of these requirements, together with consistency and converse consistency. Our main result is that the generalized serial rule, which we propose as an adaptation of the serial rule to our setting, is the only rule satisfying sd-efficiency, the sd proportional-division lower-bound, limited invariance, and consistency. Uniqueness persists if we replace the sd proportional-division lower-bound by sd normalized-no-envy, or consistency by converse consistency, or both. The serial rule in Bogomolnaia and Moulin (2001) is characterized as a special case of our generalized serial rule.

**Thursday 13 December 2012 12:45-13:45****WREN-LEWIS Liam**(PSE) :__Hold-up problems in international electricity trade__- AbstractThis paper investigates the underdevelopment of electricity trade between African coun- tries. I build a model where hold-up problems originating from incomplete contracts decrease countries' willingness to trade. In particular, an inability to commit to future trade reduces the specialisation of investment. The paper then uses the model to explore potential policy solutions including deregulation and the liberalisation of ownership.

**Thursday 6 December 2012 12:45-13:45****CANTALLA David**(Centro de Estudios Economicos, El Colegio de Mexico) :__Housing Markets with Endogenous Budget Constraints__**Co-auteur : Juan Sebastian Pereyra**- AbstractThis paper addresses the existence of competitive equilibrium in the variant of the Assignment Game where budget-constrained agents are endowed with one good, that can be sold to buy another good. We de?ne the Money Scarcity (MS) condition and its Strong (SMS) and Weak (WMS) versions. The WMS condition ensures the existence of an equilibrium in cases where Quinzii’s indis- pensability of money assumption does not hold. We consider two mechanisms to ?nd a competitive equilibrium which are extended versions of Gale’s Top Trad- ing Cycles algorithm and of the Exact Auction Mechanism of Demange, Gale and Sotomayor. Under MS, the ?rst mechanism is strategy-proof; the second is not. We strengthen the MS condition (SMS) to guarantee the existence of Nash equilibria in the revelation game induced by the second mechanism, where the outcome coincides with the assignment found by the ?rst mechanism; moreover, this assignment is Pareto e?cient.

**Thursday 29 November 2012 12:45-13:45****POZZI Andrea**(Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance) :__The Effect of Internet Distribution on Brick-and-mortar Sales__- AbstractI study the introduction of an online shopping service for a large supermarket chain that also operates a wide network of brick-and-mortar stores. The establishment of the Internet channel led to a 13 percent increase in overall revenues, inducing only limited cannibalization on traditional sales. I provide insights on the mechanism behind this result. I show that selling on the web removes travel costs and helps the retailer to attract new business from customers living far away from its stores. I also document that revenues increase more in markets where the chain faces more competitors. This suggests that the new sales represent in part business diverted from rival supermarkets.

**Thursday 15 November 2012 12:15-13:45****MARFAN Manuel**(PSE) :__Rules versus discretion under limited commitment__- AbstractThis paper studies decision making by an uninformed authority that will be better informed in the future, and whose expected actions will affect a third party’s decision making. The trade-off between rules and discretion is studied in this setting, when information is not verifiable by the third party, thus inducing the authority to misreport it. A necessary and a sufficient condition for continuity of the decision rule as a function of the information parameter are given, and under some structural conditions the optimal mechanism is characterized.

**Thursday 25 October 2012 12:45-13:45****SPECTOR David**(PSE) :__"Non-verifiable self-reporting and collusion"__- AbstractMany cartels involve companies reporting their sales to their competitors in a non-verifiable way, long before individual sales information becomes public. This paper assesses how the possible collusive outcomes depend on the possibility of engaging in such cheap talk. It is shown that for some parameter values, monopoly prices can be sustained in equilibrium only if such cheap talk is possible. The reason is that if communication is precluded, the occurrence of wasteful price wars may be the only way to deter deviations, whereas the possibility of communicating frequently, even if only by issuing non-verifiable reports, allows companies to fine-tune more efficient disciplining devices such as voluntary, temporary self-exclusion.

**Thursday 11 October 2012 12:45-13:45****HEINRICH Nax**(PSE) :__"The Evolution of Core Stability in Decentralized Matching Markets"__**Co-auteur : Peyton Young, Bary Pradelski**- AbstractDecentralized matching platforms on the internet allow large numbers of agents to interact anonymously at virtually no cost. Very little information is available to market participants and trade takes place at many different prices simultaneously. We propose a decentralized learning process in such environments that leads to stable and efficient outcomes. Agents on each side of the market make demands of potential partners and are matched if their demands are mutually compatible. Matched agents occasionally experiment with higher demands, while unmatched agents lower their demands in the hope of attracting partners. This learning process implements core allocations even though agents have no knowledge of other agents’ strategies, payoffs, or the structure of the game, and there is no central authority with such knowledge either.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 27 September 2012 12:45-13:45****WILNER Lionel**(Crest -LEI) :__"Do consumers correctly expect price reductions? Testing dynamic behavior"__**Co-auteur : Philippe Février**- AbstractBoth theoretical and empirical dynamics literature require agents to solve complex dynamic programs given their information set, which assumes implicitly that agents are fully rational and have perfect expectations. We claim that this assumption is easily testable provided that market-level data on prices and purchases are available. Using data on albums exhibiting frequent episodes of sales, we perform the test and find that consumers hold simple expectations on the timing of sales: everything happens as if consumers were expecting a Markov price process. On the contrary, the firm is more sophisticated and does not follow such a policy. Our results are coherent with the idea that agents rationality is bounded because of limited memory or limited capacity. These results have important implications in terms of demand estimation, firms' optimal pricing strategy and welfare.

**Thursday 20 September 2012 12:45-13:45****WEINSTEIN Jonathan**(Northwestern University) :__"A Bayesian Foundation for Classical Hypothesis Testing."__- AbstractA decision-maker can ensure dynamic consistency by following Bayes' rule, but he may wish to balance such consistency against other goals. That is, when the decision-maker is surprised by a pattern unaccounted for in his prior, he may wish to change his beliefs in a way which violates Bayes' rule, but he may also wish to limit his inconsistency. We show that if such non-Bayesian events, or \paradigm shifts," are rare, in the sense that they occur only with a small probability according to the decision-maker's initial belief, the decision-maker will be \approximately" dynamically con- sistent. Our notion of \approximate" dynamic consistency is that the possible arbitrage against the decision-maker is small compared to the size of his transactions. The quantity is equivalent to the level of a classical hypothesis test, so our results provide a decision-theoretic foundation for the classical criteria for rejecting a null hypothesis. Our ndings give the decision-maker some latitude to revise his model while bounding the pain of inconsistency, and unify the classical and Bayesian modes of inference.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 5 July 2012 12:45-13:45****SALOMON Antoine**(Imagine, Ecole des Ponts ParisTech) :__Strategic learning and bandit games__

**Thursday 14 June 2012 12:45-13:45****TESCHL Miriam**(University of Vienna) :__Theory of choice under internal conflict__

**Thursday 31 May 2012 12:45-13:45****LEFEBVRE Perrin**(PSE) :__Downstream lobbying and informational frictions__

**Thursday 24 May 2012 12:45-13:45****MICHELUCCI Fabio**(CERGE-EI, Pragues) :__The English Auction, Rushes, and a Selaed Bid Efficient Auction__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 10 May 2012 12:45-13:45****KRANTON Rachel**(Duke University and PSE) :__Striving for Social Status in Networks__

**Thursday 5 April 2012 12:45-13:45****KUSHNIR Alexey**(University of Zurich) :__A geometric approach to mechanism design__

**Thursday 29 March 2012 12:45-13:45****VANASCO Victoria**(UC Berkeley and PSE) :__Learning by Lending: The Informational Role of Financial Intermediaries__

**Thursday 22 March 2012 12:45-13:45****LACLAU Marie**(HEC Paris) :__Communication in repeated network games with private monitoring__

**Thursday 15 March 2012 12:45-13:45****KANDORI Michihiro**(University of Tokyo) :__Asynchronous Revision Games__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 8 March 2012 12:45-13:45****OZGUR Onur**(Université de Montréal) :__Dynamic Linear Economies with Social Interactions__

**Thursday 16 February 2012 12:45-13:45****TRUYTS Tom**(U. Leuven) :__Stochastic Signaling: Information Substitutes and Complements__

**Thursday 9 February 2012 12:45-13:45****SPAETER Sandrine**(BETA, Univ. Strasbourg) :__The Prudent Principal__**Co-author(s): Bernard Sinclair-Desgagné**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 2 February 2012 12:45-13:45****KOLM Julian**(Université de Vienna) :__Learning Across Subgames: An Application to the Hold-up Problem"__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 12 January 2012 12:45-13:45****GUESNERIE Roger**(PSE) :__Eductive Stability in Real Business Cycle Models__**Co-author(s): G. Evans & B. McGough**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 5 January 2012 12:45-13:45****CASELLA Alessandra**(University Columbia) :__Vote trading with and without party leaders__**Co-author(s) Tom Palfrey & Sebastien Turban**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 15 December 2011 12:45-13:45****CHASSAGNON Arnold**(U. Tours & PSE) :__Multiple lenders, strategic default and the role of debt covenants__

**Thursday 1 December 2011 12:45-13:45****GUERON Yves**(UCL ) :__Failure of Gradualism under Imperfect Monitoring__

**Thursday 17 November 2011 13:00-13:45****MARCH Christoph**(PSE ) :__Do We Follow Others when We Should? A Simple Test of Rational Expectations__**Attention exceptionnellement ce séminaire commencera à 13h**- AbstractWeizsäcker (2010) suggests a simple counting technique to test the rational-expectations hypothesis in experimental datasets. The counting technique is applied to data on information cascade games and regression results strongly reject the rational-expectations hypothesis. Weizsäcker (2010) concludes that participants perform poorly when trying to extract the information that is contained in others' choices. We replace participants' choices with equilibrium choices in the cascade game dataset and we show that the counting technique sometimes leads to the erroneous conclusion that players follow their signal more often than they follow others even when the latter is the optimal decision. We correct the counting technique and we conclude that, in situations where it is empirically optimal to follow others, participants do so in the large majority of cases. We conrm that the rational-expectations hypothesis is rejected in cascade game experiments.

**Thursday 10 November 2011 12:45-13:45****RUIZ-ALISEDA Francisco**(Ecole Polytechnique ) :__The Dynamics of Protection and Imitation of Innovations__**with Emeric Henry**- AbstractMost innovators choose not to patent their inventions. This is somewhat of a puzzle for those who view innovators as at the mercy of imitators in the absence of legal protection. In practice, innovators invest actively in making their products technologically hard to reverse-engineer. In this paper, we consider the dynamics of imitation and protection of innovations, and we find that innovators can still obtain high profits in the absence of legal protection. The protection technologies that yield the highest profits for the innovator are expensive and do not protect well. Our model also allows us to draw conclusions on the design of patent policy and on the dynamics of employment and mobility of researchers in innovative industries.

**Thursday 20 October 2011 12:45-13:45****KOESSLER Frederic**(PSE) :__Extortion and Political Risk Insurance in Weak Governance Countries__

**Thursday 13 October 2011 12:45-13:45****BIANCHI Milo**(U. Paris-Dauphine) :__Creative Accounting and Efficient Markets__

**Thursday 6 October 2011 12:45-13:45****DE CORNIERE Alexandre**(PSE) :__Search Advertising__

**Thursday 29 September 2011 12:45-13:45****COLLIARD Jean-Edouard**(PSE) :__Rational Blinders: Is it Possible to Regulate Banks Using their Internal Risk Models?__

**Thursday 23 June 2011 12:45-13:45****MARCH Christoph**(PSE) :__Individual Learning and Strategic Thinking in Laboratory Cascades__

**Thursday 9 June 2011 12:45-13:45****KORIYAMA Yukio**(Ecole Polytechnique) :__Optimal Apportionment__**Co-auteur(s) : Jean-François Laslier**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 19 May 2011 12:45-13:45****BEHRINGER Stefan**(University of Bonn) :__Price Wars in Two-Sided Markets: The case of the UK Quality Newspapers__**Co-auteur(s) : Lapo Filistrucchi**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 5 May 2011 12:45-13:45****LAMY Laurent**(PSE) :__On the use of absolute auctions and secret reserve prices__**Co-auteur(s) : Philippe Jehiel**

**Thursday 28 April 2011 12:45-13:45****SAND-ZANTMAN Wilfried**(Toulouse School of Economics) :__Contracting with Bypass in Bilateral Relationship__**with Bruno Jullien and Jerome Pouyet**

**Thursday 7 April 2011 12:45-13:45****LIMARDI Michela**(PSE) :__Nongovernmental Regulation: NGO Monitoring and Firm Compliance with Social Standards__

**Thursday 31 March 2011 12:45-13:45****BRAOUEZEC Yann**(Ecole Supérieure d’Ingénieurs Léonard de Vinci) :__Some theory of constrained third-degree price discrimination__

**Thursday 24 March 2011 12:45-13:45****BRAMOULLE Yann**(Université Laval) :__Favoritism__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 10 March 2011 12:45-13:45****LEVY Raphaël**(University of Mannheim) :__Humouring both parties: a model of two-sided reputation__

**Thursday 3 March 2011 12:45-13:45****TUKIAINEN Janne**(University of Helsinki) :__The Effect of Minimum Bid Increment on Revenue in Internet Auctions: Evidence from a Field Experiment__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 10 February 2011 12:45-13:45****LEVY Raphaël**(U. Mannheim - TBA) :__*__

**Thursday 3 February 2011 12:45-13:45****GOSSNER Olivier**(PSE) :__Entropy and the value of information for investors__**Co-auteur(s) : Antonio Cabrales & Roberto Serrano**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 20 January 2011 12:45-13:45****MORENO DE BARREDA Ines**(LSE) :__Cheap Talk With Two-Sided Private Information__- AbstractI investigate the strategic interaction between a perfectly informed expert and a decision maker when the latter has imperfect private information relevant to the decision. To analyse the effect of the decision maker's information, I extend the Crawford and Sobel (1982) canonical model of cheap talk by allowing the decision maker to access an unbiased and symmetric signal about the state of the world. I first show that for symmetric preferences partition equilibria exist in this more general environment. Second, for quadratic-loss preferences, I show that access to private information might hamper communication. Surprisingly, in a wide range of environments, the decision maker private information cannot make up for the loss in communication implying that the welfare of both agents decreases.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 6 January 2011 12:45-13:45****BIANCINI Sara**(Thema, Cergy) :__Intellectual Property Rights Adoption in Developing Countries__

**Thursday 9 December 2010 12:45-13:45****KOVBASYUK Sergei**(TSE and CREST) :__Optimal Certification Design__

**Thursday 2 December 2010 12:45-13:45****GODEFROY Raphael**(PSE) :__Choosing Choices: Agenda Selection with Uncertain Issues__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 25 November 2010 12:45-13:45****DE CORNIERE Alexandre**(PSE & CREST-ENSAE) :__Online Advertising and Privacy__**with Romain de Nijs**

**Thursday 28 October 2010 12:45-13:45****VIDA Peter**(University of Vienna) :__Collusion communication schemes in first price auction__

**Thursday 14 October 2010 12:45-13:45****COLLIARD Jean-Edouard**(PSE) :__The Impact of Private Information about Positive Feedback Trading__

**Thursday 7 October 2010 12:45-13:45****PAWLOWITSCH Christina**(PSE) :__Why evolution does not necessarily lead to an optimal signaling system__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 30 September 2010 12:45-13:45****MARCH Christopher**(PSE) :__Adaptive Social Learning__- Full text [pdf]

**Tuesday 8 June 2010 12:45-13:45****BRESKY Michal**(CERGE-EI, Prague) :__Revenue and Efficiency in Multi-Unit Uniform-Price Auctions__

**Thursday 3 June 2010 12:45-13:45****PICARD Pierre**(Ecole Polytechnique: TBA) :__*__

**Thursday 27 May 2010 12:45-13:45****DE NIJS Romain**(PSE) :__Dynamic Targeted Pricing in Online Markets__

**Thursday 20 May 2010 12:45-13:45****CRAWFORD Vincent**(Oxford) :__New York City Cabdrivers’ Labor Supply Revisited: Reference-Dependent Preferences with Rational-Expectations Targets for Hours and Income__**with Juanjuan Meng**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 13 May 2010 12:45-13:45****BRESKY Michal**(CERGE-EI, Prague) :__Revenue and Efficiency in Multi-Unit Uniform-Price Auctions__

**Thursday 6 May 2010 12:45-13:45****LASLIER Jean-François**(Ecole Polytechnique) :__Stubborn learning__**with Bernard Walliser**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 8 April 2010 12:45-13:45****The session was canceled.****LAMY Laurent**(PSE : TBA) :__*__

**Thursday 25 March 2010 12:45-13:45****JANSEN Jos**(Max Planck Institute ) :__Share To Scare: Technology Sharing in the Absence of Intellectual Property Rights__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 11 March 2010 12:45-13:45****GOSSNER Olivier**(PSE : TBA) :__A Folk Theorem in Robust Equilibrium Structures.__

**Thursday 11 March 2010 12:45-13:45**- *

**Thursday 18 February 2010 12:45-13:45****FERAL Arnaud**(U. Cergy : TBA) :__Merger Control with Transfers from the Capital Gains Tax__

**Thursday 4 February 2010 12:45-13:45****PERONA Mathieu**(PSE) :__How broadcasting quotas harm program diversity__

**Thursday 28 January 2010 12:45-13:45****MARTIMORT David**(TSE) :__Public Contracting in Delegated Agency Games__**with Lars Stole - David Martimort will be at PSE-Jourdan on thursday (building E), please fill this form if you want to meet him**

**Thursday 21 January 2010 12:45-13:45****TOXYAERD Flavio**(University of Cambridge) :__The Economics of Infectious Disease__

**Thursday 10 December 2009 12:45-13:45****HARSTAD Ron**(University of Missouri) :__Two Examples of Why I've Worked with Mike Rothkopf : "Winner's Curse Corrections Magnify Adverse Selection" (joint with Robert Bordley) and "Auctioning Rights to Choose When Competition Persists"__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 26 November 2009 12:45-13:45****ROGERS Brian**(Northwestern) :__Diversity and Popularity in Social Networks (avec Yann Bramoulle).__**Brian Rogers sera à Jourdan la journée, contactez moi si vous voulez le rencontrer, ou complétez ceci: http://www.doodle.com/6paq5gc44vys3hzi**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 12 November 2009 12:45-13:45****TERCIEUX Olivier**(PSE) :__Common p-Beliefs and the Hold-Up Problem (avec Philippe Aghion, Drew Fudenberg, Richard Holden et Takashi Kunimoto)__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 15 October 2009 12:45-13:45****WALLISER Bernard**(PSE) :__La révision des croyances multi-agents (avec JC Vergnaud et A Billot)__

**Thursday 15 October 2009 12:45-13:45****WALLISER Bernard**(PSE) :__La révision des croyances multi-agents (avec JC Vergnaud et A Billot)__

**Thursday 1 October 2009 12:45-13:45****FLECKINGER Pierre**(PSE) :__The Incentive Value of Deadlines__

**Thursday 1 October 2009 12:45-13:45****FLECKINGER Pierre**(PSE) :__The Incentive Value of Deadlines__

**Thursday 24 September 2009 12:45-13:45****MENAGER Lucie**(Paris 2) :__Intimidation strategies in competitive bidding__

**Thursday 24 September 2009 12:45-13:45****MENAGER Lucie**(Paris 2) :__Intimidation strategies in competitive bidding__

**Thursday 4 June 2009 12:45-13:45****COLLIARD Jean-Edouard**(PSE) :__Competition between limit order markets and trading fees__

**Thursday 28 May 2009 12:45-13:45****MAILTAH George**(University of Pennsylvania) :__Common Learning in the Presence of Dependence__

**Thursday 14 May 2009 12:45-13:45****KRANTON Rachel**(University of Maryland) :__Networked Teams and Public Goods: Who Does the Work?__

**Thursday 23 April 2009 12:45-13:45****The session was canceled.****ALKAN Ahmet**(Sabanci University) :__Stable Matching Through Stable Shortlists__

**Thursday 9 April 2009 12:45-13:45****RENY Philip**(University of Chicago) :__On the Existence of Monotone Pure Strategy Equilibria in Bayesian Games.__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 2 April 2009 12:45-13:45****The session was canceled.****PERONA Mathieu**(PSE) :__*__

**Thursday 26 March 2009 12:45-13:45****MIERENDORFF Konrad**(University of Bonn) :__Optimal Dynamic Mechanism Design with Deadlines__

**Thursday 19 March 2009 12:45-13:45****PICCOLO Salvator**(University of Salerno) :__Multiple-Bank Lending, Creditor Rights and Information Sharing.__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 5 March 2009 12:45-13:45****GORDON Sidartha**(University of Montreal) :__Iteratively Stable Equilibria in Cheap Talk Games__

**Thursday 26 February 2009 12:45-13:45****KUNIMOTO Takashi**(McGill University) :__Robust Virtual Implementation with Incomplete Information: Towards a Reinterpretation of the Wilson Doctrine__

**Thursday 19 February 2009 12:45-13:45****SEKIGUCHI Tadashi**(Kyoto University) :__Repeated Games with Costly Imperfect Monitoring (joint with Eiichi Miyagawa and Yasuyuki Miyahara)__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 12 February 2009 12:45-13:45****MATHIS Jérôme**(TSE) :__Rating the Raters: Are Reputation Concerns Powerful enough to Discipline Rating Agencies?__

**Thursday 5 February 2009 12:45-13:45****LAMBERT-MOGILIANSKY Ariane**(PSE) :__TI-games I: An Exploration of Type Indeterminacy in Strategic Decision-making__- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 29 January 2009 12:45-13:45****DE CORNIERE Alexandre**(PSE) :__On the Optimal Design of a Search Engine's Advertising Platform__

**Thursday 22 January 2009 12:45-13:45****BLOCH Francis**(Polytechnique) :__Optimal assignment of reassignable objects__

**Thursday 15 January 2009 12:45-13:45****The session was canceled.****DE CORNIERE Alexandre**(PSE) :__On the Optimal Design of a Search Engine's Advertising Platform__

**Thursday 11 December 2008 12:45-13:45****LOVO Stefano**(HEC) :__Belief-free Equilibria in Games with Incomplete Information: The N-player Case__

**Thursday 4 December 2008 12:45-13:45****ETTINGER David**(Univ. Cergy) :__Deception in a Repeated Expert/Agent Interaction: Theory and Experiment__

**Thursday 27 November 2008 12:45-13:45****OYAMA Daisuke**(Hitotsubashi Univ.) :__On Ex Post Individually Rational Partnership Dissolution__

**Thursday 13 November 2008 12:45-13:45****NUNEZ Matias**(Ecole polytechnique) :__A Study of Approval Voting on Large Poisson Games__

**Thursday 23 October 2008 12:45-13:45****The session was canceled.****PICCOLO Salvatore**(Univ. of Salerno) :__The strategic value of quantity forcing contracts__

**Thursday 16 October 2008 12:45-13:45****CASELLA Alessandra**(Columbia Univ.) :__Storable Votes and Agenda Control. Theory and Experiments__

**Thursday 2 October 2008 12:45-13:45****LAMY Laurent**(PSE) :__Mechanism Design with Partially-Specified Participation Games__

**Thursday 18 September 2008 12:45-13:45****FALLY Thibault**(PSE) :__Global Sourcing under imperfect capital markets__

**Thursday 29 May 2008 12:45-13:45****DENG X.**(City univ. of Hong Kong) :__Sales of Clicks and Auction Theory__- AbstractSponsored search has become a principal source of revenue for search engine companies. The business model relies on advertisement sales that provide advertisers opportunities to introduce their products directly to potential customers. Pricing of such advertising positions has been vitally important for the search engines. The generalized second price auction has turned out to be the primary protocol for such sponsored search markets. While several Nash equilibria may exist for the generalized second price auction, we propose the concept of the forward looking Nash equilibrium as the bidder's individual rational manipulation outcome. We further identify and focus on traffic arbitrage and click arbitrage possibilities crossing multiple markets as well as derive and characterize equilibria across markets.

**Thursday 15 May 2008 12:45-13:45****KOESSLER F.**(PSE) :__Multidimensional Communication Mechanisms: Cooperative and Conflicting Designs__**Co-auteur : D. Martimort**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 17 April 2008 12:45-13:45****The session was canceled.****KOESSLER Frédéric**(PSE) :__Multidimensional Communication Mechanisms: Cooperative and Conflicting Designs__**David Martimort**

**Thursday 10 April 2008 12:45-13:45****VAN DER STRAETEN Karine**(PSE) :__A Communication Game on Electoral Platforms__**Gabrielle Demange**

**Thursday 20 March 2008 12:45-13:45****DESSEIN W.**(Univ. of Chicago) :__Organize to Compete__**R. Alonso and N. Matouschek**

**Thursday 21 February 2008 12:45-13:45****MOIZEAU F.**(Toulouse School of Economics) :__Dynamic Regulation of Quality__

**Thursday 14 February 2008 12:45-13:45****The session was canceled.****LAMBERT-MOGILIANSKY A.**(PSE) :__*__

**Thursday 31 January 2008 12:45-13:45****GOSSNER O.**(PSE) :__Efficiency in repeated prisoner's dilemma without conditional independence__**Co-auteurs : K. Fong, J. Horner, et Y. Sannikov**

**Thursday 24 January 2008 12:45-13:45****BIRAN O.**(Univ. de Paris 9) :__Efficiency and the Final Consumer in Resale Markets with Externalities__

**Thursday 10 January 2008 12:45-13:45****OURY M.**(PSE) :__Continuous Implementation__**Co-auteur : O. Tercieux**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 20 December 2007 12:45-13:45****RAYO L.**(Univ. of Chicago) :__Status, Market Power, and Veblen Effects__**Co-auteurs : Miguel Diaz, Haresh Sapra**- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 13 December 2007 12:45-13:45****SAURI ROMERO L.**(European univ. institute) :__Parallel trade and incentives to innovate when governments decide on prices__

**Thursday 29 November 2007 12:45-13:45****RENAULT R.**(Univ. de Cergy-Pontoise) :__Gathering and disseminating information in discrete choice models__

**Thursday 15 November 2007 12:45-13:45****HAGENBACH J.**(Univ. de Paris 1) :__Strategic Communication Networks__

**Thursday 25 October 2007 12:45-13:45****COMOLA M.**(Univ. Pompeu Fabra) :__The Network Structure of Informal Arrangements : Evidence from Rural Tanzania__

**Thursday 4 October 2007 12:45-13:45****MIERENDORFF K.**(Univ. Bonn) :__An efficient Intertemporal Auction__

**Thursday 14 June 2007 12:45-13:45****SCHULTZ N.**(PSE) :__Anticompetitive Vertical Mergers Waves__**Co-auteur (s) : J. Hombert et J. Pouyet**- AbstractWe develop an equilibrium model of vertical mergers. We show that, when a wave of mergers removes all upstream firms, the competitive forces on the upstream market may collapse. Indeed, when an integrated firm supplies the upstream market, it internalizes the fact that customers lost on the downstream market can be recovered via the upstream market. Thus, the upstream supplier charges higher downstream prices. Its integrated rivals benefit from this behavior, they may therefore not undercut on the upstream market. This mechanism leads to anticompetitive waves of mergers. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Number: L22, L13, L42. Keywords: vertical merger, vertical integration, foreclosure.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 7 June 2007 12:45-13:45****AUSUBEL L. M.**(Univ. of Maryland) :__Walrasian Tatonnement for Discrete Goods__

**Thursday 24 May 2007 12:45-13:45****TAKAHASHI S.**(Harvard univ.) :__Community Enforcement when Players Observe Partners’ Past Play__- AbstractI investigate whether a community can sustain cooperation in the repeated prisoner’s dilemma by having cheaters sanctioned not by their victims but by third parties. Motivated by systems of credit history recording, online feedback systems, and some experimental settings, I assume that players can access information about their partners’ past play for free, but that acquiring information about their partners’ past partners’ past play is prohibitively costly. In this setting, even though players cannot distinguish cheaters from those who punish cheaters, I show that any level of cooperation can be sustained by an equilibrium. The equilibrium I construct has the following two properties: every player chooses his actions independently of his own record of play, and he is indifferent between cooperation and defection at all histories. This equilibrium carries over to the finite-population setting and is robust to noise in the process of choosing actions or of recording past play. The technique of equilibrium construction is applied to more general stage games. I also analyze the possibility of cooperation either when players are required to have strict incentives to follow equilibrium strategies or when only summary statistics of records are stored in the community.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 10 May 2007 12:45-13:45****ROEMER J. E.**(Yale univ.) :__The political economy of income taxation in a two-party democracy__- AbstractParties compete on a large policy space. Only a fraction of each voter type will vote for each party, perhaps because of party reputations, or issues not modeled here. Each party’s policy makers comprise two factions, one concerned with maximizing the welfare of its constituency, the other with maximizing vote share. These factions are particularly concerned with the party’s base or core voters and the swing voters, respectively. All these concepts (constituency, core, swing) are endogenous to the policy choice. An application to competition over redistribution produces equilibria in which each party proposes a piece-wise linear tax schedule, and these schedules coincide in their treatment of a possibly large interval of middle-income voters. This appears to conform with recent tax history in the US.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 26 April 2007 12:45-13:45****BOS O.**(PSE) :__Charity Auctions for the Happy Few__- AbstractRecent literature has shown that all-pay auctions raise more money for charity than winnerpay auctions. We demonstrate that the first and second-price winner-pay auctions outperform first-price all-pay auctions when bidders are sufficiently asymmetric. To prove it, we consider a framework with complete information. This analysis is relevant for two main reasons. On the one hand, complete information is more realistic and corresponds to events which occur for instance in a local service club (like in a voluntary organization) or in a show business dinner. Potential bidders are acquaintances or know one another well. On the other hand, our model keeps the qualitative predictions of a private value model under incomplete information in which bidders are ex ante asymmetric that is to say different bidders’ values are drawn from different distributions. Furthermore, we also analyze second-price all-pay auction. Finally, we show that individual minimum bids could improve the relative revenue performance of first-price allpay compared to first-price winner-pay auction. Keywords: All-pay auctions, charity, complete information, externalities JEL Classification: D44, D62, D64

**Thursday 5 April 2007 12:45-13:45****LAURENT R. A.**(PSE) :__Duopole avec biens d'expérience et consommateurs raisonnant par similarité__- AbstractDeux firmes sont présentes sur le marché d’un bien d’expérience mais ne peuvent signaler leur "qualité". L’utilité nette attendue d’un bien par les consommateurs dépend de leur degré d’exigence et d’une information privée, plus ou moins précise. Ces consommateurs choisissent le bien qui maximise l’utilité nette pondérée par la similarité entre l’information privée et le bien considéré : ce critère de décision est une version simplifiée et statique de la "Case-Based Decision Theory" (Gilboa et Schmeidler, 1995). L’introduction des prix dans cette règle de décision permet d’établir des fonctions de demande dans un cadre spatial. Cet article montre qu’un équilibre de Nash en prix existe en fonction de la forme de l’utilité nette et du degré d’asymétrie des coûts. Lorsque les consommateurs sont peu exigeants, la différenciation est purement horizontale : chaque firme sert les consommateurs informés sur son bien. Si les consommateurs sont relativement exigeants, une dimension verticale est introduite dans la différenciation : la firme vendant le bien le moins apprécié choisit un prix faible et attire les consommateurs dont l’information est la moins précise. Les autres consommateurs achètent le bien concurrent. Toutefois, si les consommateurs sont très exigeants, cette dimension verticale disparaît. classification jel : D11, D43, L13. mots clés : différenciation des produits, oligopole, biens d’expérience, information privée, théorie de la décision à base de cas.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 29 March 2007 12:45-13:45****CHASSANG S.**(MIT) :__Fear of miscoordination and the robustness of cooperation in dynamic global games with exit__- AbstractThis paper develops a framework to assess the impact of miscoordination fear on agents' ability to sustain dynamic cooperation. Building on theoretical insights from Carlsson and van Damme (1993), it explores the effect of small amounts of private information on a class of dynamic cooperation games with exit. It is shown that lack of common knowledge creates a fear of miscoordination which pushes players away from the full-information Pareto frontier. Unlike in one-shot two-by-two games, the global games information structure does not yield equilibrium uniqueness, however, by making it harder to coordinate, it does reduce the range of equilibria and gives bite to the notion of local dominance solvability. Finally, the paper provides a simple crite- rion for the robustness of cooperation to miscoordination fear, and shows it can yield predictions that are qualitatively different from those obtained by focusing on Pareto effcient equilibria under full information. keywords: cooperation, strategic risk, miscoordination risk, global games, dy- namic games, exit games, rationalizability, local strong rationalizability, local domi- nance solvability. Jel classification codes: C72, C73
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 8 March 2007 12:45-13:45****VERDIER M.**(ENST) :__Interchange fees and incentives to invest in the quality of a payment card system__- AbstractIn this paper, I analyse the optimal interchange fee in a payment card system where two monopoly banks have the possibility to invest in quality to raise the transaction volume. I model quality as a sum of specific investments from the cardholder's bank (the Issuer) and the merchant's bank (the Acquirer), and I assume that investments impact di¤erently the consumer and the merchant side. If the level of quality is exogenous, I prove that it is optimal for the payment platform to set an interchange fee equal to the Acquirer's margin. I extend Baxter (1983)'s model by proving that the optimal interchange fee depends on the level of quality of the payment system. However, if banks have the possibility to invest in quality, and if the perception of quality improvements is higher on the consumer side, the optimal interchange fee can be lower than the Acquirer's margin. This is because the interchange fee and the Acquirer's investments are strategic substitutes. If investments impact relatively more the merchant side, the optimal interchange fee remains equal to the Acquirer's margin. JEL Codes: G21, L31, L42. Keywords: Payment card systems, interchange fee, two-sided markets, investments in quality.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 15 February 2007 12:45-13:45****LAMBERT-MOGILIANSKI A.**(PSE) :__Système non-classique et rationalité limitée__**Co-auteur (s) : V. I. Danilov**- AbstractIndividual choices often depend on the order in which decisions are made, i.e., they exhibit non-commutativity. In this paper, we expose a general theory of measurable systems (an example of which is an individual’s preferences) allowing for incompatible (non-commuting) measurements. The basic concepts are illustrated in an example of non-classical rational choice. We conclude with a discussion of some of the basic properties of non-classical systems in the context of social sciences. In particular, we argue that the distinctive feature of non-classical systems translates into a formulation of bounded rationality. JEL: D80, C65, B41 keywords: non-classical system, incompatible measurement, orthospace, state, properties.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 8 February 2007 12:45-13:45****LEGER P. T.**(HEC) :__Provider Competition in a Dynamic Setting__**Co-auteur (s) : M. Allard & L. Rochaix**- AbstractIn this paper, we examine provider and patient behaviour where effort is non-contractible and competition between providers is modeled in an explicit way. More specifically, we construct a model where physicians repeatedly compete for patients and where patients' outside options are solved for in equilibrium. In our model, physicians are characterized by an individual-specific ethical constraint which allows for unobserved heterogeneity in the physicians market. Allowing for unobserved heterogeneity in the physicians market introduces uncertainty in the patient's expected treatment if he were in fact to leave his current physician to seek care elsewhere. We also introduce switching costs associated with moving from one physician to another and, un- certainty in the treatment-outcome relationships. Our model can generate equilibria which are consistent with real-world observations. That is, our model can generate treatment heterogene- ity, unstable physician-patient relationships and, over-treatment (a form of defensive medicine). Our model also suggests several avenues which may lead to more e¢ cient provision of care. JEL classification: I10, I18, J24, C30 Keywords: Physician Payment Mechanisms, Physician heterogeneity, Competition, Information Asymmetry, Insurance.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 25 January 2007 12:45-13:45****CHASSAGNON A.**(PSE) :__On moral hazard and non exclusive contracts__

**Thursday 11 January 2007 12:45-13:45****MENONI B.**(Centre de recherche en économie et statistique) :__Decision making with doubt regarding the consequences of an action__- AbstractAnscombe & Aumann (1963) improved the model developed by von Neumann & Morgenstern (1944) suggesting that the outcome of an act can be a lottery. They showed that if the preference relation of a decision maker obeys several axioms then the latter behaves as if they were maximizing some expected utility. We slightly depart from their definition of acts and consider that, in a given state of Nature, the result of an act is a possibility distribution over outcomes rather than a probability distribution. We then extend the work by ? to a more general setting. One can consider our contribution as a refinement of a model developed by Ghirardato (2001): the latter models the consequence of an act as a list of possible outcomes. We add to the list of possible outcomes some structure, namely a qualitative structure. We show that if the preference relation a decision maker may have obeys several restrictions, their choices ensue from the maximization of a – qualitative – expected utility. Keywords: Decision making, ordinal representation, possibility theory. JEL Classification: D81, D83, D89.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 21 December 2006 11:00-12:00****WEYL G.**(Princeton univ.) :__The Price Theory of Two-Sided Markets__- AbstractI establish a number of baseline positive and normative results in the price theory of two-sided markets building on the work of Rochet and Tirole (2003). On the positive side, I introduce the notion of vulnerability of demand to separate previously confounded effects. I find that competition, price controls and subsidies always reduce the price level, defined as the sum of prices on the two sides of the market. However, price controls and competition that are “unbalanced” may raise prices on one side of the market. The normative analysis emphasizes the importance of externalities across the two sides of the market and their impact on socially optimal pricing. The socially optimal price level, which takes an intuitive Ramsey-pricing form, is always below cost. Subsidies may be desirable even if the profits of the firm are disregarded. In determining optimal price balance, seemingly similar welfare criteria generally conflict. Consumers on one side of the market may want to make transfers to the other side in order to thicken their pool of partners. Unbalanced competition that undermines such transfers may harm all parties. A number of implications for policy are discussed.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 7 December 2006 12:45-13:45****LAMY L.**(Laboratoire d'économie industrielle) :__Order Independent Individual Rationality__- AbstractWe consider the implementation of an economic outcome under complete information when the principal cannot commit to a simultaneous participation game. From a class of sequential participation games, we introduce the concept of implementability under order independent individual rationality. We characterize the set of implementable mechanisms, which is possibly a non-convex set, and we solve the optimal design program: the principal raises a lower revenue but economic efficiency is not damaged.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 23 November 2006 12:45-13:45****NIKOLOVA R.**(Laboratoire d'économie industrielle) :__Incentives, markets and knowledge based hierarchies__

**Thursday 16 November 2006 12:45-13:45****DESGRANGES G.**(THEMA) :__Strongly Rational Expectations Equilibria, Endogenous Acquisition of Information and the Grossman-Stiglitz Paradox__**Co-auteur (s) : M. Heinemann**- AbstractStrongly Rational Expectations Equilibria, Endogenous Acquisition of Information and the Grossman-Stiglitz Paradox Abstract: This paper analyzes conditions for existence of a strongly rational expectations equilibrium (SREE) in models with private information where the amount of private information is endogenously determined and where the price transmits relevant information to market participants. It is shown that the conditions for existence of a SREE known from models with exogenously given private information have to be qualified if private information is endogenously determined. A SREE exists only if informativeness of the market price falls short of a specific lower bound, which depends on the properties of the cost function associated with the individual acquisition of information. This upper bound is generally lower than that valid in case of exogenously given information. An interpretation that links our results to the famous Grossman-Stiglitz Paradox is also given.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 19 October 2006 12:45-13:45****LAURENT R.A.**(PSE) :__Differentiated Duopoly with Elimination By Aspects__- AbstractElimination by aspects (EBA) is a discrete model of probabilistic choice worked out by Tversky in 1972 which supposes that decision makers follow a particular heuristic during a process of sequential choice. Goods are described by their attributes and, at each decision stage, consumers eliminate all the products not having an expected specific attribute, until only one option remains. In this paper, probabilities resulting from the EBA model are used to construct demands of a differentiated duopoly with imperfectly rational consumers. These demands are also consistent with partial heterogeneity of preferences and may be linked with a spatial framework in which consumers have convex perception of distance. In this model, a price Nash equilibrium in pure strategies exists under two conditions on attributes level and unit costs. At the outcome, the “differentiation by attributes” constitutes a general framework which embodies both horizontal and vertical differentiation. When the equilibrium does not exist, the interaction of best response functions of the firms induces an Edgeworth cycle instead of an exit of the lowest attributes level firm. This result underlines the role of cost asymmetries in the existence of such a cycle.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 12 October 2006 12:45-13:45****SIMULA L.**(PSE) :__Optimal Nonlinear Income Tax when Highly Skilled Vote with their Feet__**Co-auteur (s) : A. Trannoy**- AbstractThis paper examines how allowing individuals to emigrate to pay lower taxes changes the optimal non-linear income tax scheme in a Mirrleesian economy. Type-dependent participation constraints are borrowed from contract theory. An individual emigrates if his domestic utility is less than his utility abroad net of migration costs, utilities and costs both depending on productivity. Three social criteria are distinguished according to the agents whose welfare matters. Mobility significantly alters the closed-economy results qualitatively, but also quantitatively as verified by simulations. A curse of the middle-skilled occurs in the first-best. In the second-best, the middle-skilled can support the highest average tax rates and the marginal tax rates can be negative. Moreover, preventing emigration of the highly-skilled is not necessarily optimal.
- Full text [pdf]

**Thursday 21 September 2006 12:45-13:45****KETS W.**(Tilburg univ.) :__Learning to be Prepared__**Co-auteur : Mark Voorneved**- AbstractBehavioral economics provides several motivations for the common observation that agents appear somewhat unwilling to deviate from recent choices. More recent choices can be more salient than other choices, or more readily available in the agent’s mind. Alternatively, agents may have formed habits, use rules of thumb, or lock in on certain modes of behavior as a result of learning by doing. This paper provides discrete-time adjustment processes for strategic games in which players display precisely such a bias towards recent choices. In addition, players choose best replies to beliefs supported by observed play in the recent past, in line with much of the literature on learning. These processes eventually settle down in the minimal prep sets of Voorneveld (2004, 2005).
- Full text [pdf]

**0000****LEVY Gilat**(London School of Economics) :__*__

**0000**- campus Jourdan, 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris
**BASTIANELLO Lorenzo**(Paris 1) :__Target-based solutions for Nash bargaining__- AbstractAbstract. We revisit the Nash model for two-person bargaining. A mediator knows agents' ordinal preferences over feasible proposals, but has incomplete information about their acceptance thresholds. We provide a behavioural characterisation under which the mediator recommends a proposal that maximises the probability that bargainers strike an agreement. Some major solutions are recovered as special cases; in particular, we o ffer a straightforward interpretation for the product operator underlying the Nash solution.

**0000**- Campus Jourdan, bâtiment G, 1er étage, salle de réunions
**REDLICKI Bartosz**(U of Cambridge) :__*__

**0000****RIVERA Thomas**(HEC) :__Incentives and the Structure of Communication__- AbstractThis paper analyzes the incentives that arise within an organization when communication is restricted to a particular network structure (e.g., a hierarchy). We show that restricting communication between the principal and agents may create incentives for the agents to misbehave when transmitting information and tasks throughout the organization. Such incentives can render the principal's most preferred outcome infeasible and therefore introduces a trade off between the cost of communication borne by the principal and the benefit of curbing incentives to deviate induced by the communication structure. To remedy this issue, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions on the topology of the network of communication such that restricting communication to a particular network does not restrict the set of outcomes that the principal could otherwise achieve. In this sense, we show that for any underlying incentives and any outcome available when communication is unrestricted, there exists a (finite) communication scheme restricted to a particular network that implements this outcome (i.e., does not induce agents to misbehave in the communication phase) if and only if that network satisfies our conditions.