Ethics : Research integrity

Research integrity is essential to the smooth running of research at the Paris School of Economics.

Research activity must be conducted on the basis of the highest international standards. Minimum professional ethics require that members of the Paris School of Economics do not tolerate scientific fraud, plagiarism or falsification of data. Any indication of non-compliance or accommodation with this fundamental principle would immediately give rise to investigation by the PSE authorities, up to and including sanctions where appropriate.

Co-writing, data collection and making data available to colleagues or the community must also respect these ethical principles. With regard to the confidentiality of data collected, current regulations must be strictly respected.

PSE also has an Institutional Review Board (IRB), registered with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). It ensures compliance with the ethics of research involving human subjects.

Institutional Review Board

The Paris School of Economics has an Institutional Review Board (IRB), registered with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Its purpose is to ensure compliance with ethics for research involving human subjects.

The Paris School of Economics (PSE) has an Institutional Review Board (IRB), registered with the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Its purpose is to ensure ethical compliance for research involving human subjects. The IRB was designed to address the needs of researchers who carry out social experiments, principally randomized control trials and lab experiments. Any researcher affiliated with PSE and J-PAL Europe can request a review of their file, as well as research teams from the University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbone, EHESS, and PSL.

The IRB’s role is not to rule on the legality of an experimentation. The IRB limits itself to providing an ethical opinion on the applications for which it considers itself competent. Research teams themselves hold the responsibility of ensuring strict compliance with the law (including the Jardé Law, GDPR, CNIL, any local legislation where relevant if the study is implemented abroad, etc.), and to report to the IRB any potential risk to human subjects involved in their studies, as well as any risks that may arise from the study’s implementation.

The IRB takes no position on the relevance of individual research studies. Where ethical risks are identified, the trade-off between these risks and the benefits for the research / society must be carefully assessed and an argument presented to the IRB by the research team. This is particularly true for any case in which a waiver of informed consent is requested. It is essential that research teams are capable of identifying these risks; they must therefore be trained in the specifics of studies on human subjects. There are a number of online training courses that provide the basic knowledge needed to conduct ethical research. For example:

Research teams submitting an application to the IRB must commit to such training.

The committee is composed of at least ten members, including at least two members from the LEEP, two members from J-PAL Europe, and two members from outside the Paris School of Economics, who elect a chairperson from among themselves. The committee elects one of its members to serve as president. The committee meets once a year to review its activities and to co-ordinate its principles.

Contact: Qaiser Raza – irb@psemail.eu

Under the authority of the president, the secretariat passes each request for ethics clearance to one of its members for appraisal. Any member whose review of an application may pose a conflict of interest must recuse him or herself from its review.

If the examiner believes that the application does not require further investigation by the committee, then the president can issue a certificate of compliance.

If the examiner considers that there may be grounds on which to deny the application, or that further investigation is required, then the committee will meet within one month to examine the application, with a quorum of four of the ten members.

Certificates of compliance issued by the IRB are valid for one year and are renewable. Renewal is at the initiative of the applicant, who must report any changes to the protocol or any new risks that have arisen during implementation.

The format of any application to the IRB depends on the nature of the experiment proposed: download the J-PAL template below for RCTs and the LEEP template for lab experiments. Applications should be submitted to irb@psemail.eu. The estimated response time is 15 working days.

J-PAL Europe templates

LEEP template

Nota bene: Those projects that deal exclusively with the collection of data in France are subject to the Data Protection Act and thus are handled by the GDPR. They are not eligible for review by the IRB.